mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: Jay Buddhabhatti <jay.buddhabhatti@amd.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Joel GUITTET <jguittet.opensource@witekio.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bad commit backported on the v5.15.y branch ?
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:45:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <06bab5c5-e9fd-4741-bab7-6b199cfac18a@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM9P192MB1316ABE1A8E1D41C4243F596D7792@AM9P192MB1316.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On 11.10.24 10:48, Joel GUITTET wrote:
> 
> I faced some issue related to scaling frequency on ZynqMP device
> using v5.15.167 kernel. As an exemple setting the scaling frequency
> below show it's not properly set:
> 
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/
> scaling_available_frequencies 299999 399999 599999 1199999
> 
> echo 399999 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/
> scaling_setspeed
> 
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_cur_freq 399999
> 
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/cpuinfo_cur_freq 299999
> ====> Should be 399999
> 
> After analysis of this issue with the help of Xilinx, it appears
> that a commit was backported on the 5.15.y branch, but probably it
> should not, or not as is. The commit is
> 9117fc44fd3a9538261e530ba5a022dfc9519620 modifying drivers/clk/
> zynqmp/divider.c.

FWIW, that is 1fe15be1fb6135 ("drivers: clk: zynqmp: update divider
round rate logic") [v6.8-rc1].

> Is anybody reading this message able to answer why it was
> backported ?

Looks like because it fixes a bug. I CCed the original author and those
that handled the patch, maybe they can help us out and tell us what's
the best strategy forward here.

> The information I have until now is that it is intended
> recent kernel version. Dependencies for this modification is
> currently under clarification with Xilinx (maybe another commit to
> backport).
> 
> By the way, reverting this commit fix the issue shown above.
Does 6.12-rc work fine for you? Because if not, we should fix the
problem there.

Ciao, Thorsten

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-14  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-11  8:48 Joel GUITTET
2024-10-14  6:45 ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2024-10-16  9:23   ` Joel GUITTET
2024-10-16 10:53     ` Greg KH
2024-10-16 13:13       ` Joel GUITTET
2024-10-16 14:58         ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=06bab5c5-e9fd-4741-bab7-6b199cfac18a@leemhuis.info \
    --to=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jay.buddhabhatti@amd.com \
    --cc=jguittet.opensource@witekio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®