From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8821C32751 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 19:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3904206B8 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 19:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="qyvp3QZB" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729431AbfGaTta (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:49:30 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:55684 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726469AbfGaTta (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:49:30 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6VJnQoD054130; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:49:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1564602566; bh=90qhXSlmHXE2mbrpuN9h3XFGjfZAIqDGl2c4Qk/xiJ4=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=qyvp3QZBPi2dl7InlHaHt7M4L83Cktnov0SsQ4bPIbdEJJGxDrU6Pgd2enU1ciyBT Tm0V+cznRgePDnUZb8RcclnnfHEWSr6FTHU+MHjwsX9EKZktuz4sWBHo4Ms9nlUSr0 olmPsdgfS2zV7jFoux9Z0+P7v3hkL6pAoCoTmRts= Received: from DFLE108.ent.ti.com (dfle108.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.29]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6VJnQpa129497 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:49:26 -0500 Received: from DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) by DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:49:25 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:49:25 -0500 Received: from [10.250.65.13] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6VJnPxj090663; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:49:25 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] leds: Update the lp55xx to use the multi color framework To: Jacek Anaszewski , CC: , References: <20190725182818.29556-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20190725182818.29556-10-dmurphy@ti.com> <486308e9-e3e1-5f34-5af7-217527f2f1f9@ti.com> <310ce737-df38-766c-b24a-17c26c5f9ab6@gmail.com> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: <06c65f10-26d9-42aa-3dfa-19f2b8b1e413@ti.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:49:25 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <310ce737-df38-766c-b24a-17c26c5f9ab6@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jacek On 7/31/19 2:45 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > Dan, > > On 7/31/19 8:55 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: >> Jacek >> >> Thanks for looking > You're welcome. > [...} > I don't see any parsing for color here but I suppose that I can add that > now > I thought about that occurrence in lp5xx_parse_channel_child(). No that is color of the child subnode.  These will be the actual color. But we can check the color of the child node to the parent node and if that is MULTI_ID then process it as a multi color interface. Dan > [...] >