From: Qiheng Lin <linqiheng@huawei.com>
To: <mike.travis@hpe.com>, <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>,
<russ.anderson@hpe.com>, <dvhart@infradead.org>,
<andy@infradead.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<bp@alien8.de>, <x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <steve.wahl@hpe.com>, <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] x86/platform/uv: functions should not be declared extern
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 14:40:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06d88bb6-650d-9b94-f4e6-e274dd188ca1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531060747.21934-1-linqiheng@huawei.com>
在 2021/5/31 14:07, Qiheng Lin 写道:
> These function declarations in 'bios.h' are already marked extern, thus
> their definition should not have the keyword.
>
> This quiets the following sparse warnings:
> function 'uv_bios_get_master_nasid' with external linkage has definition
> function 'uv_bios_get_heapsize' with external linkage has definition
> function 'uv_bios_install_heap' with external linkage has definition
> function 'uv_bios_obj_count' with external linkage has definition
> function 'uv_bios_enum_objs' with external linkage has definition
> function 'uv_bios_enum_ports' with external linkage has definition
> function 'uv_bios_get_geoinfo' with external linkage has definition
> function 'uv_bios_get_pci_topology' with external linkage has definition
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiheng Lin <linqiheng@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
> index bf31af3d32d6..7e7634c8be62 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
> @@ -172,55 +172,55 @@ int uv_bios_set_legacy_vga_target(bool decode, int domain, int bus)
> (u64)decode, (u64)domain, (u64)bus, 0, 0);
> }
>
> -extern s64 uv_bios_get_master_nasid(u64 size, u64 *master_nasid)
> +s64 uv_bios_get_master_nasid(u64 size, u64 *master_nasid)
> {
> return uv_bios_call(UV_BIOS_EXTRA, 0, UV_BIOS_EXTRA_MASTER_NASID, 0,
> size, (u64)master_nasid);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_bios_get_master_nasid);
>
> -extern s64 uv_bios_get_heapsize(u64 nasid, u64 size, u64 *heap_size)
> +s64 uv_bios_get_heapsize(u64 nasid, u64 size, u64 *heap_size)
> {
> return uv_bios_call(UV_BIOS_EXTRA, nasid, UV_BIOS_EXTRA_GET_HEAPSIZE,
> 0, size, (u64)heap_size);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_bios_get_heapsize);
>
> -extern s64 uv_bios_install_heap(u64 nasid, u64 heap_size, u64 *bios_heap)
> +s64 uv_bios_install_heap(u64 nasid, u64 heap_size, u64 *bios_heap)
> {
> return uv_bios_call(UV_BIOS_EXTRA, nasid, UV_BIOS_EXTRA_INSTALL_HEAP,
> 0, heap_size, (u64)bios_heap);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_bios_install_heap);
>
> -extern s64 uv_bios_obj_count(u64 nasid, u64 size, u64 *objcnt)
> +s64 uv_bios_obj_count(u64 nasid, u64 size, u64 *objcnt)
> {
> return uv_bios_call(UV_BIOS_EXTRA, nasid, UV_BIOS_EXTRA_OBJECT_COUNT,
> 0, size, (u64)objcnt);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_bios_obj_count);
>
> -extern s64 uv_bios_enum_objs(u64 nasid, u64 size, u64 *objbuf)
> +s64 uv_bios_enum_objs(u64 nasid, u64 size, u64 *objbuf)
> {
> return uv_bios_call(UV_BIOS_EXTRA, nasid, UV_BIOS_EXTRA_ENUM_OBJECTS,
> 0, size, (u64)objbuf);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_bios_enum_objs);
>
> -extern s64 uv_bios_enum_ports(u64 nasid, u64 obj_id, u64 size, u64 *portbuf)
> +s64 uv_bios_enum_ports(u64 nasid, u64 obj_id, u64 size, u64 *portbuf)
> {
> return uv_bios_call(UV_BIOS_EXTRA, nasid, UV_BIOS_EXTRA_ENUM_PORTS,
> obj_id, size, (u64)portbuf);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_bios_enum_ports);
>
> -extern s64 uv_bios_get_geoinfo(u64 nasid, u64 size, u64 *buf)
> +s64 uv_bios_get_geoinfo(u64 nasid, u64 size, u64 *buf)
> {
> return uv_bios_call(UV_BIOS_GET_GEOINFO, nasid, (u64)buf, size, 0, 0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_bios_get_geoinfo);
>
> -extern s64 uv_bios_get_pci_topology(u64 size, u64 *buf)
> +s64 uv_bios_get_pci_topology(u64 size, u64 *buf)
> {
> return uv_bios_call(UV_BIOS_GET_PCI_TOPOLOGY, (u64)buf, size, 0, 0, 0);
> }
>
I have sent a new patch with the correct subject and commit messages,
please ignore this version.
Sorry for the noise.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-01 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-31 6:07 Qiheng Lin
2021-05-31 13:45 ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-31 13:46 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-01 6:40 ` Qiheng Lin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06d88bb6-650d-9b94-f4e6-e274dd188ca1@huawei.com \
--to=linqiheng@huawei.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=russ.anderson@hpe.com \
--cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®