From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<shuah@kernel.org>, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] x86/fred: Prevent single-step upon ERETU completion
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 14:51:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06e68373-a92b-472e-8fd9-ba548119770c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8264e653-6570-4c2a-a9a7-c4104da26f76@intel.com>
On 6/5/2025 12:32 PM, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> On 6/5/2025 11:10 AM, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
>
>>
>> Xin Li (Intel) (2):
>> x86/fred/signal: Prevent single-step upon ERETU completion
>> selftests/x86: Add a test to detect infinite sigtrap handler loop
>>
>
> I tested the patches on a machine that supports FRED. The results are as
> expected:
>
Seeing a split lock warning when running the test:
x86/split lock detection: #DB: sigtrap_loop_64/4614 took a bus_lock trap
at address: 0x4011ae
Wanted to get this out sooner for awareness. Will figure out more
details and send out an update.
> FRED on — no Fix => FAIL
> FRED off — no Fix => PASS
> FRED on — with Fix => PASS
> FRED off — with Fix => PASS
>
> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
>
> Though, I haven't tested the 32-bit version of the selftest.
>
>> arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h | 22 +++++
>> arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c | 4 +
>> arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c | 4 +
>> tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile | 2 +-
>> tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigtrap_loop.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigtrap_loop.c
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-05 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 18:10 Xin Li (Intel)
2025-06-05 18:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/fred/signal: " Xin Li (Intel)
2025-06-05 18:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-06-05 18:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/x86: Add a test to detect infinite sigtrap handler loop Xin Li (Intel)
2025-06-05 19:32 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] x86/fred: Prevent single-step upon ERETU completion Sohil Mehta
2025-06-05 21:51 ` Sohil Mehta [this message]
2025-06-12 18:12 ` Xin Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06e68373-a92b-472e-8fd9-ba548119770c@intel.com \
--to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®