From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0D4C64EC4 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 09:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230427AbjCHJPj (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2023 04:15:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41384 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230383AbjCHJOu (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2023 04:14:50 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5ED998849 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 01:14:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id ay14so59173914edb.11 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 01:14:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1678266863; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WVlbKIsIKONcencGIlCVz/zMUTdvcvIEPXx7D+3nAjE=; b=LdA5rx163AC+HgqVyIy+sy0Gl2nZwk1NtVqeLbyS5v9JeajHfWzDBa611KYlhHeaDi ouXMK6QlKT4MdFQgjITg2J1sILL900Aotrlzbi01m1MOeSiDZWxCDKVWMVSTISylWC2j vMCOQdHCAF/3wxvSvMqdfjqZzaY6JEG05DNHC0+4ya97xSpTA42hEBVqk5alDM92V2/F EEVFlGMFMGn4FJ9wFPmNkvujBM6TWZxBRKW5wvDqwzg60t9TSEGjGnY+LtAbAPDrzIos pOLLFa0cfOUXLsOeWhVetUN10kUdFHIlhKVJ1p9sfy2dDuhaTQy6WchgcNxtXK3HP+GT Y/ag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678266863; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WVlbKIsIKONcencGIlCVz/zMUTdvcvIEPXx7D+3nAjE=; b=R5PKRMnFsUzNpHq1HfJ+18En3+WUbJDh0jTBcBkKalALkJrhPHg7ewIPUeiF0vAv0p BRS6KBBJNBRwIWGZILWBAZFU9aJrypsnEr6UVNVG61O6CfyRVWRMKVqs49s6qqle5Fq/ oOXVUl2olZhj9UTyDIaE++vzuZjV0bFm+U1DIDbBBX4uVsqXDOMfYBxacIQBR4QOHbRQ Otei9dXQ/9XNtw7lOhvKCeBQ6tBwshEGJIjJVTj/s1HF9onwvo3pCMjQVHJ6LFQEZauz xmPcgE53N3ZvtW1PnrFsWXBPh7cxdzsFJ/IegLzwyxZARJzbec7B3fOU7o7Yqq7e7knv YgTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXOS1SkNjTAycMPXlsNrfJt24vUs5ZZYBUrLNuP990dctpN3UlH VRrdlZUo9yurqoX3f7qptqUWPg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/5cil+g/8SOVvjrP1ln2Nvql2jHsS3WiDe7I+EHmOgynZqYeKxSssaFWa66dlwAxdmjzlPSA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1291:b0:4ad:66b:84a5 with SMTP id w17-20020a056402129100b004ad066b84a5mr16082411edv.22.1678266863518; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 01:14:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:810d:15c0:828:bba:fbfa:8aec:a133? ([2a02:810d:15c0:828:bba:fbfa:8aec:a133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e21-20020a50d4d5000000b004d47ce55e57sm6241720edj.10.2023.03.08.01.14.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Mar 2023 01:14:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <06f8eec8-94f3-0fed-b496-831c77baf368@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:14:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] max77663-rtc: pass rtc address from device tree node if exists Content-Language: en-US From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Svyatoslav Ryhel Cc: Chanwoo Choi , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org References: <20230308083759.11692-1-clamor95@gmail.com> <190897d3-39b6-fb7c-dc18-dac580fadea6@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <190897d3-39b6-fb7c-dc18-dac580fadea6@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/03/2023 10:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 08/03/2023 09:58, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: >> I would love to, but max77663 uses max77686 rtc >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/mfd/max77620.c#L123 >> how to handle this? > > Don't top post. > > Hm, so it seems max7763 is already documented via max77620. I missed > that. Add the new property to max77620, not to max77686 RTC. It does not > look like RTC's property, but the PMIC's. To clarify - the I2C address selection for regmap is in max77686 RTC, but I meant DT property. Different thing is that we do not pass addresses as property fields. These should be devices on the I2C bus rather... unless you are aware of existing property like this? Best regards, Krzysztof