mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	 ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Cc: matthias.bgg@gmail.com, nfraprado@collabora.com,
	irving-ch.lin@mediatek.com, 	wenst@chromium.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
		linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, 	robh@kernel.org,
	krzk@kernel.org, conor@kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH - URGENT] pmdomains: mtk-pm-domains: Fix spinlock recursion in probe
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:35:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <07011558548dfc88fb237b7d21d43a6bc25dd0fd.camel@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251121125212.43093-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

Hi Angelo,

On Fri, 2025-11-21 at 13:52 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> For some reason, of_find_node_with_property() is creating a spinlock
> recursion issue along with fwnode_count_parents(), and this issue
> is making all MediaTek boards unbootable.
> 
> As of kernel v6.18-rc6, there are only three users of this function,
> one of which is this driver.
> 
> Migrate away from of_find_node_with_property() by adding a local
> scpsys_get_legacy_regmap_node() function, which acts similarly to
> of_find_node_with_property(), and calling the former in place of
> the latter.
> 
> This resolves the following spinlock recursion issue:
> 
> [    1.773979] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#2, kworker/u24:1/60
> [    1.790485]  lock: devtree_lock+0x0/0x40, .magic: dead4ead,
> .owner: kworker/u24:1/60, .owner_cpu: 2
> [    1.791644] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 60 Comm: kworker/u24:1 Tainted:
> G        W           6.18.0-rc6 #3 PREEMPT
> [    1.791649] Tainted: [W]=WARN
> [    1.791650] Hardware name: MediaTek Genio-510 EVK (DT)
> [    1.791653] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
> [    1.791658] Call trace:
> [    1.791659]  show_stack+0x18/0x30 (C)
> [    1.791664]  dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x94
> [    1.791668]  dump_stack+0x18/0x24
> [    1.791672]  spin_dump+0x78/0x88
> [    1.791678]  do_raw_spin_lock+0x110/0x140
> [    1.791684]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x58/0x6c
> [    1.791690]  of_get_parent+0x28/0x74
> [    1.791694]  of_fwnode_get_parent+0x38/0x7c
> [    1.791700]  fwnode_count_parents+0x34/0xf0
> [    1.791705]  fwnode_full_name_string+0x28/0x120
> [    1.791710]  device_node_string+0x3e4/0x50c
> [    1.791715]  pointer+0x294/0x430
> [    1.791718]  vsnprintf+0x21c/0x5bc
> [    1.791722]  vprintk_store+0x108/0x47c
> [    1.791728]  vprintk_emit+0xc4/0x350
> [    1.791732]  vprintk_default+0x34/0x40
> [    1.791736]  vprintk+0x24/0x30
> [    1.791740]  _printk+0x60/0x8c
> [    1.791744]  of_node_release+0x154/0x194
> [    1.791749]  kobject_put+0xa0/0x120
> [    1.791753]  of_node_put+0x18/0x28
> [    1.791756]  of_find_node_with_property+0x74/0x100
> [    1.791761]  scpsys_probe+0x338/0x5e0
> [    1.791765]  platform_probe+0x5c/0xa4
> [    1.791770]  really_probe+0xbc/0x2ac
> [    1.791774]  __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x118
> [    1.791779]  driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x170
> [    1.791783]  __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0x150
> [    1.791788]  bus_for_each_drv+0x88/0xe8
> [    1.791792]  __device_attach+0x9c/0x1a0
> [    1.791796]  device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20
> [    1.791801]  bus_probe_device+0xa0/0xa4
> [    1.791805]  deferred_probe_work_func+0x88/0xd0
> [    1.791809]  process_one_work+0x1e8/0x448
> [    1.791813]  worker_thread+0x1ac/0x340
> [    1.791816]  kthread+0x138/0x220
> [    1.791821]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> 
> Fixes: c29345fa5f66 ("pmdomain: mediatek: Refactor bus protection
> regmaps retrieval")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
> 
> This might not be the best fix to perform, and I have Cc'ed Rob and
> Krzysztof for them to have a look at the spinlock recursion issue,
> as I think it either has to be fixed, or the affected function has
> to be removed (or both, actually - in any case, if not fixed, this
> could backfire, and I'm not sure that the only function that shows
> this issue is just only of_find_node_with_property() or if others
> also do; at least, nothing else on MediaTek machines as of now).
> 
> Counting that this makes *all* MediaTek machines to be unbootable,
> I'd prefer this fix to get merged immediately - so that it lands
> in v6.18 (which is at rc6 at the time of writing).
> 
> That - because I think that resolving the source of this issue will
> take a bit of time and research - and I really don't want the LTS
> kernel to be broken on all MediaTek devices.
> 
> Note: When I initially tested the commit pointed out in the Fixes
> tag, it was working with no spinlock recursion - I don't clearly
> remember what kernel version was that, but I think it was some
> linux-next around v6.16 or v6.17.
> 
>  drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> index 407b4a7aba10..721224c89865 100644
> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> @@ -1006,6 +1006,18 @@ static void scpsys_domain_cleanup(struct
> scpsys *scpsys)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static struct device_node *scpsys_get_legacy_regmap(struct
> device_node *np, const char *pn)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *local_node;
> +
> +	for_each_child_of_node(np, local_node) {
> +		if (of_property_present(local_node, pn))
> +			return local_node;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  static int scpsys_get_bus_protection_legacy(struct device *dev,
> struct scpsys *scpsys)
>  {
>  	const u8 bp_blocks[3] = {
> @@ -1027,7 +1039,7 @@ static int
> scpsys_get_bus_protection_legacy(struct device *dev, struct scpsys *s
>  	 * this makes it then possible to allocate the array of
> bus_prot
>  	 * regmaps and convert all to the new style handling.
>  	 */
> -	node = of_find_node_with_property(np, "mediatek,infracfg");
> +	node = scpsys_get_legacy_regmap(np, "mediatek,infracfg");
>  	if (node) {
>  		regmap[0] = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(node,
> "mediatek,infracfg");
>  		of_node_put(node);
> @@ -1040,7 +1052,7 @@ static int
> scpsys_get_bus_protection_legacy(struct device *dev, struct scpsys *s
>  		regmap[0] = NULL;
>  	}
>  
> -	node = of_find_node_with_property(np, "mediatek,smi");
> +	node = scpsys_get_legacy_regmap(np, "mediatek,smi");
>  	if (node) {
>  		smi_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "mediatek,smi", 0);
>  		of_node_put(node);
> @@ -1058,7 +1070,7 @@ static int
> scpsys_get_bus_protection_legacy(struct device *dev, struct scpsys *s
>  		regmap[1] = NULL;
>  	}
>  
> -	node = of_find_node_with_property(np, "mediatek,infracfg-
> nao");
> +	node = scpsys_get_legacy_regmap(np, "mediatek,infracfg-
> nao");
>  	if (node) {
>  		regmap[2] = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(node,
> "mediatek,infracfg-nao");
>  		num_regmaps++;
I've tested your patch on top of a v6.18-rc6 kernel with a default
config. My Mediatek Genio 350-EVK (MT8365), 510-EVK (MT8370) and 1200-
EVK (MT8395) boards are all now booting without issue.

Tested-by: Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com>

Regards,
Louis-Alexis

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-21 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-21 12:52 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-11-21 13:35 ` Louis-Alexis Eyraud [this message]
2025-11-24  7:35   ` Macpaul Lin (林智斌)
2025-11-24 10:16 ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=07011558548dfc88fb237b7d21d43a6bc25dd0fd.camel@collabora.com \
    --to=louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=irving-ch.lin@mediatek.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nfraprado@collabora.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wenst@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®