From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
hare@suse.de, ming.lei@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pragalla@codeaurora.org, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com,
yuyufen@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] blk-mq: Freeze and quiesce all queues for tagset in elevator_exit()
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:35:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <072178c2-a112-8f35-8f60-e5c1396561d7@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c6cbe11-ac31-9a47-0096-17fbd584b83e@huawei.com>
On 3/8/21 2:50 AM, John Garry wrote:
> Please let me know further thoughts.
Hi John,
My guess is that it is safe to nest these two locks. I was asking
because I had not found any information about the nesting in the patch
description.
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-08 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-05 15:14 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Avoid use-after-free for accessing old requests John Garry
2021-03-05 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] blk-mq: Clean up references to old requests when freeing rqs John Garry
2021-03-06 2:52 ` Khazhy Kumykov
2021-03-08 11:18 ` John Garry
2021-03-06 18:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-08 10:37 ` John Garry
2021-03-05 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] blk-mq: Freeze and quiesce all queues for tagset in elevator_exit() John Garry
2021-03-06 4:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-08 10:50 ` John Garry
2021-03-08 19:35 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-03-10 15:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-11 0:58 ` Ming Lei
2021-03-11 8:21 ` John Garry
2021-03-12 23:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-16 16:15 ` John Garry
2021-03-16 17:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-16 17:43 ` John Garry
2021-03-16 19:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-19 18:19 ` John Garry
2021-03-19 18:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-05 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] blk-mq: Lockout tagset iterator when exiting elevator John Garry
2021-03-06 4:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-08 11:17 ` John Garry
2021-03-08 19:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-09 17:47 ` John Garry
2021-03-09 19:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-10 8:52 ` John Garry
2021-03-10 16:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-10 17:26 ` John Garry
2021-03-18 10:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Avoid use-after-free for accessing old requests Shinichiro Kawasaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=072178c2-a112-8f35-8f60-e5c1396561d7@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=pragalla@codeaurora.org \
--cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome