mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	quentin.perret@arm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/11] cpufreq/schedutil: use rt utilization tracking
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 11:00:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <072d862a-7b9c-3d17-d0cc-a3082b826cf9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1528459794-13066-5-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

On 06/08/2018 02:09 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Take into account rt utilization when selecting an OPP for cfs tasks in order
> to reflect the utilization of the CPU.

The rt utilization signal is only tracked per-cpu, not per-entity. So it 
is not aware of PELT migrations (attach/detach).

IMHO, this patch deserves some explanation why the temporary 
inflation/deflation of the OPP driving utilization signal in case an 
rt-task migrates off/on (missing detach/attach for rt-signal) doesn't 
harm performance or energy consumption.

There was some talk (mainly on #sched irc) about ... (1) preempted cfs 
tasks (with reduced demand (utilization id only running) signals) using 
this remaining rt utilization of an rt task which migrated off and ... 
(2) going to max when an rt tasks runs ... but a summary of all of that 
in this patch would really help to understand.

> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
>   kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 9 ++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 28592b6..32f97fb 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct sugov_cpu {
>   	/* The fields below are only needed when sharing a policy: */
>   	unsigned long		util_cfs;
>   	unsigned long		util_dl;
> +	unsigned long		util_rt;
>   	unsigned long		max;
>   
>   	/* The field below is for single-CPU policies only: */
> @@ -178,15 +179,21 @@ static void sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
>   	sg_cpu->max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, sg_cpu->cpu);
>   	sg_cpu->util_cfs = cpu_util_cfs(rq);
>   	sg_cpu->util_dl  = cpu_util_dl(rq);
> +	sg_cpu->util_rt  = cpu_util_rt(rq);
>   }
>   
>   static unsigned long sugov_aggregate_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
>   {
>   	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
> +	unsigned long util;
>   
>   	if (rq->rt.rt_nr_running)
>   		return sg_cpu->max;
>   
> +	util = sg_cpu->util_dl;
> +	util += sg_cpu->util_cfs;
> +	util += sg_cpu->util_rt;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Utilization required by DEADLINE must always be granted while, for
>   	 * FAIR, we use blocked utilization of IDLE CPUs as a mechanism to
> @@ -197,7 +204,7 @@ static unsigned long sugov_aggregate_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
>   	 * util_cfs + util_dl as requested freq. However, cpufreq is not yet
>   	 * ready for such an interface. So, we only do the latter for now.
>   	 */
> -	return min(sg_cpu->max, (sg_cpu->util_dl + sg_cpu->util_cfs));
> +	return min(sg_cpu->max, util);
>   }
>   
>   static void sugov_set_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time, unsigned int flags)
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-18  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-08 12:09 [PATCH v6 00/11] track CPU utilization Vincent Guittot
2018-06-08 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] sched/pelt: Move pelt related code in a dedicated file Vincent Guittot
2018-06-08 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] sched/pelt: remove blank line Vincent Guittot
2018-06-21 14:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 18:42     ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-08 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] sched/rt: add rt_rq utilization tracking Vincent Guittot
2018-06-15 11:52   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-06-15 12:18     ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-15 14:55       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-06-21 18:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-08 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] cpufreq/schedutil: use rt " Vincent Guittot
2018-06-18  9:00   ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2018-06-18 12:58     ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-21 18:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 18:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22  8:10       ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-22 11:41         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 12:14           ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-22  7:58     ` Juri Lelli
2018-06-22  7:58     ` Quentin Perret
2018-06-22 11:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 11:44         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 12:23         ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-22 13:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 13:52             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 13:54             ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-22 13:57               ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-22 14:46                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 14:49                   ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-22 14:11               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 14:48                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 14:12               ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-22 12:54         ` Quentin Perret
2018-06-22 13:29           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 15:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 15:30           ` Quentin Perret
2018-06-22 17:24           ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-08 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] sched/dl: add dl_rq " Vincent Guittot
2018-06-08 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] cpufreq/schedutil: use dl " Vincent Guittot
2018-06-08 12:39   ` Juri Lelli
2018-06-08 12:48     ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-08 12:54       ` Juri Lelli
2018-06-08 13:36         ` Juri Lelli
2018-06-08 13:38           ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-22 15:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 17:22     ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-08 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] sched/irq: add irq " Vincent Guittot
2018-06-08 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] cpufreq/schedutil: take into account interrupt Vincent Guittot
2018-06-12  8:54   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-06-12  9:10     ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-12  9:16       ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-12  9:20         ` Quentin Perret
2018-06-12  9:26           ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-08 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] sched: use pelt for scale_rt_capacity() Vincent Guittot
2018-06-08 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] sched: remove rt_avg code Vincent Guittot
2018-06-08 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] proc/sched: remove unused sched_time_avg_ms Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=072d862a-7b9c-3d17-d0cc-a3082b826cf9@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®