Re: [PATCH v3] hwmon: (tmp401) Add OF device ID table

[Camel Guo <camelg@axis.com>]

On 5/3/22 07:33, Camel Guo wrote:
> The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices
> are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a
> I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and
> that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>.
> 
> But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an
> OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF.
> 
> Fixes: af503716ac14 ("i2c: core: report OF style module alias for 
> devices registered via OF")
> Signed-off-by: Camel Guo <camel.guo@axis.com>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>      v3:
>       - Copy commit message from commit 72fc64c68decf119466 ("hwmon: 
> (tmp103)
>         Add OF device ID table")
>       - Add Fixes tag
>      v2:
>       - Put evidence and circumstances in commit message
> 
>   drivers/hwmon/tmp401.c | 11 +++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp401.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp401.c
> index b86d9df7105d..52c9e7d3f2ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp401.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp401.c
> @@ -708,10 +708,21 @@ static int tmp401_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>           return 0;
>   }
> 
> +static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused tmp4xx_of_match[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "ti,tmp401", },
> +       { .compatible = "ti,tmp411", },
> +       { .compatible = "ti,tmp431", },
> +       { .compatible = "ti,tmp432", },
> +       { .compatible = "ti,tmp435", },
> +       { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tmp4xx_of_match);
> +
>   static struct i2c_driver tmp401_driver = {
>           .class          = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
>           .driver = {
>                   .name   = "tmp401",
> +               .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(tmp4xx_of_match),
>           },
>           .probe_new      = tmp401_probe,
>           .id_table       = tmp401_id,
> 
> base-commit: 38d741cb70b30741c0e802cbed7bd9cf4fd15fa4
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

Sorry for the spam, but after rethinking, I think some description in 
commit message is improper. Hence I updated it in v4. Please review that 
one instead.