From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: <jingoohan1@gmail.com>, <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>,
<thierry.reding@gmail.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kthota@nvidia.com>,
<mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>, <sagar.tv@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] PCI: dwc: Add API support to de-initialize host
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:19:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07c3dd04-cfd0-2d52-5917-25d0e40ad00b@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a6696e0-fc53-2e6b-536b-d1d2668e0f21@nvidia.com>
On 6/13/2019 11:54 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> On 6/7/2019 6:43 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>> On 5/27/2019 4:39 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>>> On 5/7/2019 12:25 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>>>> On 5/7/2019 11:19 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>>>>> On 5/3/2019 4:53 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 10:34:25PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>>>>>>> Add an API to group all the tasks to be done to de-initialize host which
>>>>>>> can then be called by any DesignWare core based driver implementations
>>>>>>> while adding .remove() support in their respective drivers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
>>>>>>> Acked-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Changes from v3:
>>>>>>> * Added check if (pci_msi_enabled() && !pp->ops->msi_host_init) before calling
>>>>>>> dw_pcie_free_msi() API to mimic init path
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Changes from v2:
>>>>>>> * Rebased on top of linux-next top of the tree branch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Changes from v1:
>>>>>>> * s/Designware/DesignWare
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 5 +++++
>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Series doesn't apply to v5.1-rc1, what's based on ? I suspect
>>>>>> there is a dependency on pci/keystone, given the tight timeline
>>>>>> for the merge window, would you mind postponing it to v5.3 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do not think it is urgent, I am happy to create a branch
>>>>>> for it as soon as v5.2-rc1 is released.
>>>>> I rebased my changes on top of linux-next. I see that they have conflicts
>>>>> on top of v5.1-rc1. Do you want me to rebase them on top of v5.1-rc1 instead
>>>>> of linux-next?
>>>>> I'm fine with v5.2-rc1 as well.I forgot to mention that these changes are made on top of Jisheng's patches
>>>> FWIW, Jisheng's patches are approved and applied to pci/dwc for v5.2
>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1968324.html
>>>
>>> Hi Lorenzo,
>>> Now that v5.2-rc2 is also available, could you please pick up this series?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vidya Sagar
>>>
>> Hi Bjorn / Lorenzo,
>> Can you please pick up these two patches?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vidya Sagar
> Apologies for pinging again. These two patches can be applied directly on top of
> v5.2-rc4. Please do let me know if there is anything required from my side.
>
> Thanks,
> Vidya Sagar
>
Sorry for pinging again. Please let me know if these patches need to be sent again.
Thanks,
Vidya Sagar
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Lorenzo
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>>>>>>> index 77db32529319..d069e4290180 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>>>>>>> @@ -496,6 +496,14 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> +void dw_pcie_host_deinit(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + pci_stop_root_bus(pp->root_bus);
>>>>>>> + pci_remove_root_bus(pp->root_bus);
>>>>>>> + if (pci_msi_enabled() && !pp->ops->msi_host_init)
>>>>>>> + dw_pcie_free_msi(pp);
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> static int dw_pcie_access_other_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
>>>>>>> u32 devfn, int where, int size, u32 *val,
>>>>>>> bool write)
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>>>>>>> index deab426affd3..4f48ec78c7b9 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>>>>>>> @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp);
>>>>>>> void dw_pcie_free_msi(struct pcie_port *pp);
>>>>>>> void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp);
>>>>>>> int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp);
>>>>>>> +void dw_pcie_host_deinit(struct pcie_port *pp);
>>>>>>> int dw_pcie_allocate_domains(struct pcie_port *pp);
>>>>>>> #else
>>>>>>> static inline irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>>>>> @@ -372,6 +373,10 @@ static inline int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> +static inline void dw_pcie_host_deinit(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> static inline int dw_pcie_allocate_domains(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-18 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-02 17:04 Vidya Sagar
2019-05-02 17:04 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] PCI: dwc: Export APIs to support .remove() implementation Vidya Sagar
2019-05-03 11:23 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] PCI: dwc: Add API support to de-initialize host Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-05-07 5:49 ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-07 6:55 ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-27 11:09 ` Vidya Sagar
2019-06-07 13:13 ` Vidya Sagar
2019-06-13 18:24 ` Vidya Sagar
2019-06-18 4:49 ` Vidya Sagar [this message]
2019-06-18 9:36 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-06-18 10:51 ` Vidya Sagar
2019-06-18 14:28 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-06-19 5:11 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-06-20 16:52 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-06-21 5:33 ` Vidya Sagar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07c3dd04-cfd0-2d52-5917-25d0e40ad00b@nvidia.com \
--to=vidyas@nvidia.com \
--cc=Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kthota@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
--cc=sagar.tv@gmail.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®