From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754968AbYIQJ7z (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:59:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754772AbYIQJ7m (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:59:42 -0400 Received: from relay04.mail-hub.dodo.com.au ([123.2.6.239]:45432 "EHLO relay04.mail-hub.dodo.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754761AbYIQJ7l (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:59:41 -0400 From: Grant Coady To: Martin Knoblauch Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bogus process accounting in 2.6.27-rc5? Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:59:27 +1000 Organization: http://bugsplatter.id.au/ Reply-To: Grant Coady Message-ID: <07l1d4lhg4c4ogs3jbv8bnnpqes2367p0d@4ax.com> References: <888717.44345.qm@web32605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <888717.44345.qm@web32605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Martin Knoblauch wrote: >Hi, > > just saw this one for the first time. Don't think it is easily reproducible. Anything to worry about? > >[root@lpsdm52 build]# ps axl | grep pdflush >1 0 8221 2 20 0 0 0 conges D ? 0:01 [pdflush] >1 0 15178 2 20 0 0 0 conges D ? 0:03 [pdflush] >1 0 30843 2 20 0 0 0 conges D ? 0:00 [pdflush] >1 0 30844 2 20 0 0 0 conges D ? 0:00 [pdflush] >1 0 30845 2 20 0 0 0 conges D ? 0:00 [pdflush] >1 0 30852 2 20 0 0 0 conges D ? 0:00 [pdflush] >1 0 30853 2 20 0 0 0 conges D ? 21133795:39 [pdflush] >1 0 30854 2 20 0 0 0 conges D ? 0:00 [pdflush] > > And yes, rc5 is stone-age, I know. Bug's been closed, I think it's fixed now. Grant. > >Cheers > >Martin >------------------------------------------------------ >Martin Knoblauch >email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de >www: http://www.knobisoft.de