From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pegase2.c-s.fr (pegase2.c-s.fr [93.17.235.10]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675A11DDC2E for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 16:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=93.17.235.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738774207; cv=none; b=FsO9kdod2kGv3rOtnf3EXRDWTfHLtohhzngam09gDu36ksIQAtxb9JvFAXyamEx/ONXgTajubeip3l2c6bN98xMhAsi0FmLRtWdxASCtiLsqCkg7BrXHx6KOMlxXlQOsakJV41qtsC+hPw6Zxv6qzdozJTfHonRhF/x0I2WYvEo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738774207; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qEJLCLbs9CvmUa4Sm9Q77W9q0GaeSE1O59uVKSVwrTM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=KOI4WXHrVQmaarjgGynxgN0B/hwoimHBxooFuWnT4J5Ts4yvtNtGU/TjlPPALpJD++MLf82EAT/ZT9S5yr37rNAVDRvvfzOfw26br0o1Cs5AgbFJAmRZLkdW5ROZ1KUYKf9FfXa3wJUxWQdbSbCQpy105kFBXFNonfdF2Sbt5kc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=csgroup.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=csgroup.eu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=93.17.235.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=csgroup.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=csgroup.eu Received: from localhost (mailhub3.si.c-s.fr [172.26.127.67]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Yp5Sz0LYsz9sRk; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:35:47 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase2.c-s.fr ([172.26.127.65]) by localhost (pegase2.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rJSb9hOvWj2M; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:35:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase2.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Yp5Sy6Fjjz9rvV; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:35:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A5B8B76C; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:35:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id 1oTP_T_1tXfX; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:35:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.235.99] (unknown [192.168.235.99]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE3B8B763; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:35:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <08a51873-7510-4552-9bb1-3ea7ef9fbc2d@csgroup.eu> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:35:44 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: kismet: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for HUGETLBFS when selected by PPC_8xx To: Miaohe Lin , kernel test robot Cc: Paul Gazzillo , Necip Fazil Yildiran , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" References: <202501240611.LDmD2nkj-lkp@intel.com> <29cf621d-db67-6c5c-0dc5-ebe79edc6cc6@huawei.com> Content-Language: fr-FR From: Christophe Leroy In-Reply-To: <29cf621d-db67-6c5c-0dc5-ebe79edc6cc6@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 05/02/2025 à 03:39, Miaohe Lin a écrit : > On 2025/1/24 6:24, kernel test robot wrote: >> tree: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux.git&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C9284805dd2a148bd1d7e08dd458e511f%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638743199757464439%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LU9lidWjjJE3vf0TPBp1wIvUFpjnpPKq2zQVxu4Ru%2F0%3D&reserved=0 master >> head: d0d106a2bd21499901299160744e5fe9f4c83ddb >> commit: f8142cf94d4737ea0c3baffb3b9bad8addcb9b6b hugetlb: make hugetlb depends on SYSFS or SYSCTL >> date: 2 years, 4 months ago >> config: powerpc-kismet-CONFIG_HUGETLBFS-CONFIG_PPC_8xx-0-0 (https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdownload.01.org%2F0day-ci%2Farchive%2F20250124%2F202501240611.LDmD2nkj-lkp%40intel.com%2Fconfig&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C9284805dd2a148bd1d7e08dd458e511f%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638743199757478112%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9%2B4B2T41tw4xvlAkYIeOEhK9PrH17GM7KrhEOyKDxMM%3D&reserved=0) >> reproduce: (https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdownload.01.org%2F0day-ci%2Farchive%2F20250124%2F202501240611.LDmD2nkj-lkp%40intel.com%2Freproduce&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C9284805dd2a148bd1d7e08dd458e511f%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638743199757485680%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=SDjSwdEccwtqN8L4VzuYnAhq3nchpJdBi%2FaJGloeZ40%3D&reserved=0) >> >> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of >> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags >> | Reported-by: kernel test robot >> | Closes: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Foe-kbuild-all%2F202501240611.LDmD2nkj-lkp%40intel.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C9284805dd2a148bd1d7e08dd458e511f%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638743199757493154%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=DdGGMh1x6g6a%2F7hcgqmSBASk14QpA4%2F%2FmI2ztozklts%3D&reserved=0 > > Thanks for report. Sorry for late respond. I was on my Spring Festival vacation. > >> >> kismet warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >>>> kismet: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for HUGETLBFS when selected by PPC_8xx >> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for HUGETLBFS >> Depends on [n]: (X86 || IA64 || SPARC64 || ARCH_SUPPORTS_HUGETLBFS [=y] || BROKEN [=n]) && (SYSFS [=n] || SYSCTL [=n]) >> Selected by [y]: >> - PPC_8xx [=y] && > > I am a bit confused. HUGETLBFS depends on SYSFS or SYSCTL. How can it be selected while SYSFS [=n] || SYSCTL [=n]? > Or am I miss something? CONFIG_HUGETLBFS is selected by CONFIG_PPC_8xx, see commit 34536d780683 ("powerpc/8xx: Add a function to early map kernel via huge pages") Christophe