From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD4813F6DFF for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3FD20870 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="SQ6KB6o1"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="oqLnPaqN" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2E3FD20870 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731953AbeG3PIY (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:08:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:42262 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729283AbeG3PIY (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:08:24 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5450261D8F; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:33:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1532957603; bh=uFXRZDBFj+1KQiT8DzU7AxgLtNURM7oNuXS69CTRXiQ=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=SQ6KB6o1I4aFKOsTd7y84wWqDpMFhBa3qoNeBWpVJYuxQ7NW2TDF/pY8NxzzbHJqd HKqfOFrTd641CJdcVahnGZRnyW9Kaskh9aXxWcNxmC9zIsQyEWFeM4gMaHeXi+O+JV 8mA0PeEuGTS7SYQBbGnBpDL3TShsY5q3zPYpKqsY= Received: from [10.204.79.100] (blr-c-bdr-fw-01_globalnat_allzones-outside.qualcomm.com [103.229.19.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mojha@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3722560117; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:33:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1532957602; bh=uFXRZDBFj+1KQiT8DzU7AxgLtNURM7oNuXS69CTRXiQ=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=oqLnPaqNJfCC4vdB6jRefOdmDmxZurik3kRJ1LeDU5lMN4vNWGh7Ei2kqqIqzIonb hMpvMvpDcurXDtY70Vvrb8qjWK6980OVg95NPc7CqilbY3kAEGEcAnhi0PhpJm1xJK Ich8svwuQ/GQKHW94jc7osWJaQL4q688rrm8aVMg= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 3722560117 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=mojha@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpu/hotplug: Fix cpuhp_step name for timers To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Lai Jiangshan , Ingo Molnar , Brendan Jackman , Mathieu Malaterre , gkohli@codeaurora.org, neeraju@codeaurora.org References: <1532443668-26810-1-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org> <1cf38a28-e95e-a8e4-9e1f-a83a6973436a@codeaurora.org> From: Mukesh Ojha Message-ID: <08c9986e-f774-332e-9838-462921f5486f@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 19:03:00 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/30/2018 5:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Mukesh, > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Mukesh Ojha wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Can i get input on this ? > Sure. > >> Thanks, >> Mukesh >> On 7/24/2018 8:17 PM, Mukesh Ojha wrote: > The input you get is that it's unprofessional to poke people after TWO days > about a patch which is purely cosmetic. > > It's perfectly fine to send a reminder after a week for important changes > and after two for trivial cleanups like this. You really cannot expect that > maintainers and other developers permanentely sit there twiddling thumbs > and wait for new mail to arrive in order to reply immediately. Thanks for your patience and time in replying. Will keep the patience :-) Regards, Mukesh > > Thanks, > > tglx >