From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934162AbcHJSVY (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:21:24 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:49265 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933688AbcHJSVT (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:21:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] arm, dts: add TC2 cpu capacity-dmips-mhz information To: Juri Lelli References: <1468932048-31635-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> <1468932048-31635-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> <7ac935dc-9f8b-8af0-e67b-ef1c469d76f1@arm.com> <20160810154324.GJ3540@e106622-lin> Cc: Sudeep Holla , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, Liviu Dudau , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: <08d9e2ff-3c66-5129-1c82-df314e2204db@arm.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:52:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160810154324.GJ3540@e106622-lin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/08/16 16:43, Juri Lelli wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/08/16 16:33, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> Hi Juri, >> >> On 19/07/16 13:40, Juri Lelli wrote: >>> Add TC2 cpu capacity binding information. >>> >> >> If you repost it, >> >> s/binding// >> > > Yes, I think I'll need to repost, squashing the arm64 fix in the > appropriate patch. Thanks. > >>> Cc: Liviu Dudau >>> Cc: Sudeep Holla >> >> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla > > Thanks! > >> (assuming you take it via some other tree, let us know if it's >> OK to merge the DTS separately and you want us to pick them) >> > > As per off-line discussion with Russell, binding doc and arm bits should > go via his patch system. While arm64 bits could go separately via aarch64. > > Does this make sense? Yes, we can pick up the juno and tc2 dts changes and send it via arm-soc. I have already acked them, so you can take it via other tree if required. -- Regards, Sudeep