mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Cc: jack@suse.cz, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nowait aio return value
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 16:19:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <08dcc9f7-2460-c262-3194-062a25052bc3@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04be5a78-3428-c09e-bc63-5061fa568ea5@akamai.com>

Hi Jason,

On 07/26/2017 01:45 PM, Jason Baron wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In testing nowait aio on ext4, I found that when appending to a file
> the return value is EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK, because as mentioned in the
> commit this will potentially trigger an allocation. However, the EAGAIN,
> seems somewhat misleading to me, in that if I continuously try the
> write, it will never succeed.
> 
> The relevant commit is:
> 728fbc0 ext4: nowait aio support
> 
> As you can see there, failure to get the inode lock is treated as
> EAGAIN, which seems more appropriate to me, as its very likely
> to succeed on subsequent calls.
> 
> Perhaps, it could be switched to -EINVAL, or something else?
> 

Thanks for testing this.

I would suggest read it as -EWOULDBLOCK. The idea is to pass on
IOCB_NOWAIT when we don't want the I/O process to wait, and if it does
return -EWOULDBLOCK. If it returns EWOULDBLOCK in case of allocation,
you may want to allocate your file space before performing the I/O.

I would return EINVAL in case the parameters passed are incorrect.

-- 
Goldwyn

      reply	other threads:[~2017-07-26 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-26 18:45 Jason Baron
2017-07-26 21:19 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=08dcc9f7-2460-c262-3194-062a25052bc3@suse.de \
    --to=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®