From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eranian@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/5] perf core PMU support for Sapphire Rapids (Kernel)
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 11:12:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08df0d66-ae21-6e52-cef6-c003db0b75b2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YBgQoWRxpyoHDsmp@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2/1/2021 9:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> I made the below changes, does that work?
Yes, it works well.
Thanks,
Kan
>
> ---
>
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -3627,6 +3627,15 @@ static int core_pmu_hw_config(struct per
> return intel_pmu_bts_config(event);
> }
>
> +#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_AVAILABLE_MAX (INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING + \
> + ((x86_pmu.num_topdown_events - 1) << 8))
> +
> +static bool is_available_metric_event(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + return is_metric_event(event) &&
> + event->attr.config <= INTEL_TD_METRIC_AVAILABLE_MAX;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool is_mem_loads_event(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> return (event->attr.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) == X86_CONFIG(.event=0xcd, .umask=0x01);
> @@ -3711,7 +3720,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct pe
> if (event->attr.config & X86_ALL_EVENT_FLAGS)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (is_metric_event(event)) {
> + if (is_available_metric_event(event)) {
> struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader;
>
> /* The metric events don't support sampling. */
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -87,7 +87,14 @@ static inline bool is_topdown_count(stru
> return event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN;
> }
>
> -static inline bool is_metric_event(struct perf_event *event);
> +static inline bool is_metric_event(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + u64 config = event->attr.config;
> +
> + return ((config & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT) == 0) &&
> + ((config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) >= INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING) &&
> + ((config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) <= INTEL_TD_METRIC_MAX);
> +}
>
> static inline bool is_slots_event(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> @@ -901,18 +908,6 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_ht_attr ev
> struct pmu *x86_get_pmu(void);
> extern struct x86_pmu x86_pmu __read_mostly;
>
> -#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_AVAILABLE_MAX (INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING + \
> - ((x86_pmu.num_topdown_events - 1) << 8))
> -
> -static inline bool is_metric_event(struct perf_event *event)
> -{
> - u64 config = event->attr.config;
> -
> - return ((config & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT) == 0) &&
> - ((config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) >= INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING) &&
> - ((config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) <= INTEL_TD_METRIC_AVAILABLE_MAX);
> -}
> -
> static __always_inline struct x86_perf_task_context_opt *task_context_opt(void *ctx)
> {
> if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> @@ -284,10 +284,12 @@ struct x86_pmu_capability {
> #define INTEL_TD_METRIC_BAD_SPEC 0x8100 /* Bad speculation metric */
> #define INTEL_TD_METRIC_FE_BOUND 0x8200 /* FE bound metric */
> #define INTEL_TD_METRIC_BE_BOUND 0x8300 /* BE bound metric */
> -#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_HEAVY_OPS 0x8400 /* Heavy Operations metric */
> -#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_BR_MISPREDICT 0x8500 /* Branch Mispredict metric */
> -#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_FETCH_LAT 0x8600 /* Fetch Latency metric */
> -#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_MEM_BOUND 0x8700 /* Memory bound metric */
> +/* Level 2 metrics */
> +#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_HEAVY_OPS 0x8400 /* Heavy Operations metric */
> +#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_BR_MISPREDICT 0x8500 /* Branch Mispredict metric */
> +#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_FETCH_LAT 0x8600 /* Fetch Latency metric */
> +#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_MEM_BOUND 0x8700 /* Memory bound metric */
> +
> #define INTEL_TD_METRIC_MAX INTEL_TD_METRIC_MEM_BOUND
> #define INTEL_TD_METRIC_NUM 8
>
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -908,7 +908,6 @@ enum perf_event_type {
> * u32 var1_dw;
> * } && PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT
> * #endif
> - *
> * }
> * }
> * { u64 data_src; } && PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC
> @@ -1276,29 +1275,23 @@ struct perf_branch_entry {
> reserved:40;
> };
>
> -#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> union perf_sample_weight {
> __u64 full;
> +#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> struct {
> __u32 var1_dw;
> __u16 var2_w;
> __u16 var3_w;
> };
> -};
> -
> #elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> -
> -union perf_sample_weight {
> - __u64 full;
> struct {
> __u16 var3_w;
> __u16 var2_w;
> __u32 var1_dw;
> };
> -};
> -
> #else
> #error "Unknown endianness"
> #endif
> +};
>
> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_PERF_EVENT_H */
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-01 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 22:40 kan.liang
2021-01-28 22:40 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] perf/core: Add PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT kan.liang
2021-01-29 17:25 ` Liang, Kan
2021-02-04 14:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-02-04 15:24 ` Liang, Kan
2021-02-05 10:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-02-05 13:45 ` Liang, Kan
2021-02-02 11:57 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-01-28 22:40 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] perf/x86/intel: Factor out intel_update_topdown_event() kan.liang
2021-02-02 11:57 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-01-28 22:40 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] perf/x86/intel: Filter unsupported Topdown metrics event kan.liang
2021-02-02 11:57 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-01-28 22:40 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] perf/x86/intel: Add perf core PMU support for Sapphire Rapids kan.liang
2021-02-02 11:57 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-01-28 22:40 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] perf/x86/intel: Support CPUID 10.ECX to disable fixed counters kan.liang
2021-02-02 11:57 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-02-01 14:30 ` [PATCH V3 0/5] perf core PMU support for Sapphire Rapids (Kernel) Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-01 16:12 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08df0d66-ae21-6e52-cef6-c003db0b75b2@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome