From: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Nico Pache <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm/huge_memory: prevent losing PG_waiters in __split_folio_to_order()
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 09:02:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <096620df-7200-48a5-8ba7-0ad69d008869@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110-fix-split_folio_to_order-race-v4-1-cc5042f33408@nvidia.com>
在 2026/11/11 11:19, Zi Yan 写道:
> __split_folio_to_order() calls prep_compound_page() on each new head page
> to create a compound page after clear_compound_head(). prep_compound_page()
> uses non atomic __SetPageHead(). It is mostly OK, since the folio is locked
> and frozen and no one else is supposed to modify the folio's flags.
>
> However, code calling migration_entry_wait() can reach the folio by PFN,
> then access its flags. It is because softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() used
> by migration_entry_wait() sets PG_waiters concurrently without taking a
> reference and the frozen refcount during split cannot block it. Meanwhile,
> __SetPageHead() does a plain read and write, so PG_waiters atomically set
> by softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() will be lost if the set happens after
> __SetPageHead()'s read and before its write.
>
> One example code interleaving:
>
> CPU0: __split_folio_to_order(new_order>0) CPU1: do_swap_page()
>
> 1. clear_compound_head(new_head)
> new_head->compound_info = 0
> (page_folio(new_head) == new_head now)
>
> 2. migration_entry_wait()
> softleaf_to_folio(entry)
> page_folio() -> new_head
> (not the old head any more)
>
> 3. prep_compound_page(new_head, new_order)
> __SetPageHead(new_head)
> tmp = new_head->flags.f <-- load; PG_waiters == 0 in tmp
>
> 4. folio_set_waiters(new_head)
> set_bit(PG_waiters, &flags.f)
> enqueue on waitqueue, sleep
>
> 5. new_head->flags.f = tmp | (1UL << PG_head)
> <-- store; overwrites step 4, PG_waiters == 0 again
>
> Later, folio_unlock(new_folio) sees no PG_waiters, skips folio_wake_bit(),
> and CPU1 can remain blocked indefinitely.
>
> Fix it by setting PG_head along with other flags in new_folio->flags before
> smp_wmb() and clear_compound_head(). The remaining compound page metadata
> is set after clear_compound_head(). In that way, after
> clear_compound_head() makes new_folio visible, nothing overwrites the
> PG_waiters from softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() by modifying
> new_folio->flags non-atomically.
>
> While at it, use data_race() to suppress the KCSAN issue reported by Ye
> Liu's patch (the second Closes) on reading folio->flags in
> __split_folio_to_order().
>
> Suggested-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DMHE8BEEER1H.2BIY52NXATPIA@nvidia.com/
> Reported-by: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261029-data_race_huge_mem-v1-1-112e331291c1@linux.dev/
> Fixes: c010d47f107f6 ("mm: thp: split huge page to any lower order pages")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> ---
> The issue was raised by David when reviewing Ye Liu's "mm/huge_memory: use
> READ_ONCE() when cloning folio flags during split" [1]. This patch also
> supersedes Ye Liu's patch.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261029-data_race_huge_mem-v1-1-112e331291c1@linux.dev/
Fine with this superseding my READ_ONCE() patch.
Reviewed-by: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - removed the data_race() on new_folio->flags read, since there is no data
> race on it.
> - rephrased the comment above data_race() to avoid confusion.
> - rephrased the comment on setting PG_head to clarify why it needs to be
> set before smp_wmb() and why no plain RMW is allowed after
> clear_compound_head().
> - adjusted the comment on __prep_compound_page() about PG_head.
> - Link to v3: https://patch.msgid.link/20261109-fix-split_folio_to_order-race-v3-1-1cdc509e34be@nvidia.com
>
> Changes in v3:
> - set PG_head before smp_wmb() like Kiryl suggested instead of
> prep_compound_page_atomic().
> - used data_race() to suppress KCSAN reports while at it.
> - dropped Lorenzo's ack, since the patch is changed.
> - Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20261106-fix-split_folio_to_order-race-v2-1-1b59c67b8af3@nvidia.com
>
> Changes in v2:
> - renamed __prep_compound_head_and_tail() to __prep_compound_page().
> - added comments to prep_compound_page() and __prep_compound_page().
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20261029-fix-split_folio_to_order-race-v1-1-a483c7451b0d@nvidia.com
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> mm/internal.h | 2 ++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index bd44d58e86845..76c57d845269e 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3714,6 +3714,7 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
> * Don't pass it around before clear_compound_head().
> */
> struct folio *new_folio = (struct folio *)new_head;
> + memdesc_flags_t new_flags;
>
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(atomic_read(&new_folio->_mapcount) != -1, new_head);
>
> @@ -3730,8 +3731,15 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
> * unreferenced sub-pages of an anonymous THP: we can simply drop
> * PG_anon_exclusive (-> PG_mappedtodisk) for these here.
> */
> - new_folio->flags.f &= ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
> - new_folio->flags.f |= (folio->flags.f &
> + new_flags.f = new_folio->flags.f & ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
> + /*
> + * data_race() is used because folio->flags is only read here,
> + * but a reference-less writer can still write to it, e.g.,
> + * PG_waiters update from softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked().
> + * The flag is not transferred to new_flags as it is
> + * folio specific, so it is not lost.
> + */
> + new_flags.f |= data_race(folio->flags.f) &
> ((1L << PG_referenced) |
> (1L << PG_swapbacked) |
> (1L << PG_swapcache) |
> @@ -3749,7 +3757,19 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
> #endif
> (1L << PG_dirty) |
> (1L << PG_dropbehind) |
> - LRU_GEN_MASK | LRU_REFS_MASK));
> + LRU_GEN_MASK | LRU_REFS_MASK);
> +
> + /*
> + * Set PG_head before smp_wmb() and clear_compound_head().
> + * After clear_compound_head() marks new_head as a folio of its
> + * own, new_head->flags must not be modified by plain RMWs.
> + * A plain RMW can cause a loss of atomic PG_* updates from
> + * a reference-less writer, e.g., setting PG_waiters via
> + * softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked().
> + */
> + if (new_order)
> + new_flags.f |= 1L << PG_head;
> + WRITE_ONCE(new_folio->flags.f, new_flags.f);
>
> new_folio->mapping = folio->mapping;
> new_folio->index = folio->index + i;
> @@ -3779,7 +3799,11 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
> */
> clear_compound_head(new_head);
> if (new_order) {
> - prep_compound_page(new_head, new_order);
> + /*
> + * PG_head is set above, so only set up the remaining
> + * metadata on head page and tail pages.
> + */
> + __prep_compound_page(new_head, new_order);
> folio_set_large_rmappable(new_folio);
> }
>
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index aeebb3e49ed11..4ce67ce2f3fba 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -807,6 +807,8 @@ static inline void prep_compound_tail(struct page *tail,
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(tail->private);
> }
>
> +void __prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
> +
> #if defined CONFIG_COMPACTION || defined CONFIG_CMA
>
> /*
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 143776e671abb..5f03f3725dd2e 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -682,18 +682,31 @@ static inline bool pcp_allowed_order(unsigned int order)
> * This usage means that zero-order pages may not be compound.
> */
>
> -void prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> +/*
> + * Set up the metadata on head page and tail pages.
> + * Caller must set PG_head before this.
> + */
> +void __prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> {
> int i;
> int nr_pages = 1 << order;
>
> - __SetPageHead(page);
> for (i = 1; i < nr_pages; i++)
> prep_compound_tail(page + i, page, order);
>
> prep_compound_head(page, order);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * PG_head is set non-atomically. It should be used when no one else can modify
> + * @page's flags.
> + */
> +void prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> +{
> + __SetPageHead(page);
> + __prep_compound_page(page, order);
> +}
> +
> static inline void set_buddy_order(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> {
> set_page_private(page, order);
>
> ---
> base-commit: d865f2677c44cb2171b833d6775cf692756fa8be
> change-id: 20261029-fix-split_folio_to_order-race-087a2a9fbf7c
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Yan, Zi
--
Thanks,
Ye Liu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 3:19 Zi Yan
2026-11-11 7:31 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-11 18:06 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-11-12 6:56 ` Baolin Wang
2026-11-12 8:27 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-12 8:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2026-11-13 1:02 ` Ye Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=096620df-7200-48a5-8ba7-0ad69d008869@linux.dev \
--to=ye.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®