From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973EDC4167B for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232366AbjLLLrE (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2023 06:47:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58816 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229963AbjLLLrC (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2023 06:47:02 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9167EA6 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 03:47:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61161143D; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 03:47:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.39.183] (XHFQ2J9959.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.39.183]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B122A3F762; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 03:47:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <0969c413-bf40-4c46-9f1e-a92101ff2d2e@arm.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:47:03 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/15] arm64/mm: Split __flush_tlb_range() to elide trailing DSB To: Will Deacon Cc: Catalin Marinas , Ard Biesheuvel , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Andrey Konovalov , Dmitry Vyukov , Vincenzo Frascino , Andrew Morton , Anshuman Khandual , Matthew Wilcox , Yu Zhao , Mark Rutland , David Hildenbrand , Kefeng Wang , John Hubbard , Zi Yan , Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, Alistair Popple , Yang Shi , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20231204105440.61448-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com> <20231204105440.61448-13-ryan.roberts@arm.com> <20231212113517.GA28857@willie-the-truck> Content-Language: en-GB From: Ryan Roberts In-Reply-To: <20231212113517.GA28857@willie-the-truck> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/12/2023 11:35, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 10:54:37AM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote: >> Split __flush_tlb_range() into __flush_tlb_range_nosync() + >> __flush_tlb_range(), in the same way as the existing flush_tlb_page() >> arrangement. This allows calling __flush_tlb_range_nosync() to elide the >> trailing DSB. Forthcoming "contpte" code will take advantage of this >> when clearing the young bit from a contiguous range of ptes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts >> --- >> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 13 +++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h >> index bb2c2833a987..925ef3bdf9ed 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h >> @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ do { \ >> #define __flush_s2_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, tlb_level) \ >> __flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, 0, tlb_level, false) >> >> -static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, >> +static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma, >> unsigned long start, unsigned long end, >> unsigned long stride, bool last_level, >> int tlb_level) >> @@ -431,10 +431,19 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, >> else >> __flush_tlb_range_op(vae1is, start, pages, stride, asid, tlb_level, true); >> >> - dsb(ish); >> mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(vma->vm_mm, start, end); >> } >> >> +static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, >> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, >> + unsigned long stride, bool last_level, >> + int tlb_level) >> +{ >> + __flush_tlb_range_nosync(vma, start, end, stride, >> + last_level, tlb_level); >> + dsb(ish); >> +} > > Hmm, are you sure it's safe to defer the DSB until after the secondary TLB > invalidation? It will have a subtle effect on e.g. an SMMU participating > in broadcast TLB maintenance, because now the ATC will be invalidated > before completion of the TLB invalidation and it's not obviously safe to me. I'll be honest; I don't know that it's safe. The notifier calls turned up during a rebase and I stared at it for a while, before eventually concluding that I should just follow the existing pattern in __flush_tlb_page_nosync(): That one calls the mmu notifier without the dsb, then flush_tlb_page() does the dsb after. So I assumed it was safe. If you think it's not safe, I guess there is a bug to fix in __flush_tlb_page_nosync()? > > Will