From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@oracle.com>
To: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
christian.loehle@arm.com, frederic@kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [REGRESSION] sched/idle: Sysbench threads regression after f4c31b07b136
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 12:25:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <096b42fa-107f-450d-b3b1-03bcad3f1e04@oracle.com> (raw)
Hi Rafael,
We are seeing a reproducible MySQL Sysbench threads regression. A
bisect indicated the following commit as the first bad commit:
f4c31b07b136 ("sched: idle: Consolidate the handling of two special cases")
The regression was found in Oracle kernel performance testing on OCI VM
shapes:
VM Details:
* VM.Standard2.1:
x86 OCI VM shape, 1 OCPU / 2 hardware threads, about 14.5 GB RAM
* VM.Standard.A1.Flex.2:
Arm/Ampere A1 flexible VM shape, 2 vCPU threads, about 10.9 GB RAM
The ResultsDB runs show the regression in the Sysbench threads metric:
- VM.Standard2.1: 333 -> 236 (-29.1%)
- VM.Standard.A1.Flex.2: 1286 -> 1152 (-10.4%)
A test kernel was built with f4c31b07b136 reverted and the performance
regression was recovered.
From the code, it is possible the regression is due to the new
previous-wakeup heuristic in the special idle cases. Before the commit:
- no cpuidle driver:
tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick()
default_idle_call()
- one idle state:
tick_nohz_idle_retain_tick()
cpuidle state 0
After the commit, both paths use:
idle_call_stop_or_retain_tick(got_tick)
Here, got_tick is true if the CPU was woken from the previous idle-loop
iteration by the scheduler tick, and false otherwise. On this
workload/platform combination, using that previous wakeup source to
decide whether to stop or retain the tick appears to change NOHZ
behavior enough to regress this wakeup-heavy threaded workload.
Do you have any thoughts on whether this is an expected tradeoff of the
new heuristic, or whether the special cases need a narrower condition?
For our stable kernels, the immediate candidate fix is to revert the
backport, but before doing that I wanted to ask whether upstream would
prefer a targeted adjustment.
I can collect additional data if useful, for example cpuidle
driver/state information, timer interrupt counts, idle residency, perf
stat, or scheduler trace data from the affected OCI shapes.
#regzbot introduced: f4c31b07b136839e0fb3026f8a5b6543e3b14d2f
Thanks,
Joe
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 16:25 Joseph Salisbury [this message]
2026-07-02 18:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-07-06 14:29 ` Christian Loehle
2026-07-08 15:25 ` Joseph Salisbury
2026-07-24 17:20 ` Joseph Salisbury
2026-07-28 8:30 ` Christian Loehle
2026-07-28 16:37 ` [PATCH] sched/idle: Stop the tick when no cpuidle driver is available Christian Loehle
2026-11-05 23:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2026-07-29 2:36 ` [REGRESSION] sched/idle: Sysbench threads regression after f4c31b07b136 Zhan Xusheng
2026-07-29 18:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-07-29 18:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-07-30 9:27 ` Christian Loehle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=096b42fa-107f-450d-b3b1-03bcad3f1e04@oracle.com \
--to=joseph.salisbury@oracle.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®