From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: "Jérémy Jean" <Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/sqpoll: pin task across task-work publication
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:59:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <096d996d-3028-41ea-bf0c-f7eef1281fcb@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924205056.3759980-2-Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>
On 9/24/26 2:50 PM, J?r?my Jean wrote:
> SQPOLL can consume a request immediately after mpscq_push(). If this
> drops the final ring reference, ctx and tctx may be freed before
> io_req_normal_work_add() finishes using them. KASAN reports:
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in io_req_normal_work_add+0x439/0x510
> Read of size 4 at addr ff11000000ca0000 by task repro/55
> (...)
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in queue_work_on+0x25/0x70
> Write of size 8 at addr ff11000000c3bd00 by task repro/55
>
> Handle SQPOLL before publication. Pin tctx->task, publish the request,
> then use only the pinned task so the publication tail cannot dereference
> freed contexts.
>
> Fixes: af5d68f8892f ("io_uring/sqpoll: manage task_work privately")
Was going to say this isn't correct, as the mpscq is newer than that.
But I suppose this already existed before that, with the previous switch
to private task work for SQPOLL? I'll dig into that a bit...
> diff --git a/io_uring/tw.c b/io_uring/tw.c
> index f573bcc3af6a..2e37a3fd7a33 100644
> --- a/io_uring/tw.c
> +++ b/io_uring/tw.c
> @@ -210,6 +210,19 @@ void io_req_normal_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
> struct io_uring_task *tctx = req->tctx;
> struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
>
> + /* SQPOLL may consume and retire the request immediately after push. */
> + if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) {
> + struct task_struct *task = tctx->task;
> + bool first;
> +
> + get_task_struct(task);
> + first = mpscq_push(&tctx->task_list, &req->io_task_work.node);
> + if (first)
> + __set_notify_signal(task);
> + put_task_struct(task);
> + return;
> + }
There's no point in having a 'first' variable. LLM's love bools...
if (mpscq_push(&tctx->task_list, &req->io_task_work.node))
__set_notify_signal(task);
would be better.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 20:50 Jérémy Jean
2026-09-24 22:59 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2026-09-24 23:32 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=096d996d-3028-41ea-bf0c-f7eef1281fcb@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®