From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sphereful.davidgow.net (sphereful.davidgow.net [203.29.242.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11C733FAE15 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.29.242.92 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789392796; cv=none; b=TCbJxgaEH+QAjx3oKztL6q7JQKqzZwZL3yIpsJxU8kuD0b0QGoPFCjfQE1+QASWY9s1cc8xNMwc77Xlfvc7/QX1VNezGSKwOH3sGntBg3neoJ5WMfBGDwxn5lnr7RE0vuILK3t8rMZyKFe/N4kko8mK72VmKjhnBXU9yjBqBhEc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789392796; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WbsbA8MP3iRH/jdx1lVTXcmoKlay3uwN3NglQdZtH4A=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kFfWqkYAJrTehCKfCNhDJdgx8rtBu3PaCZgNb3NGtBXQR5Wv8kLwZlGFhJb30H6qTTY6+nKwRrlK5a9teqEaMkSQvtljuiZXWwxfXpohKnCekwUDqLcmRCxAmaBXcbP+R2nd9dBRl4Ct1Lrf4hCElmi8MOLB86x162fr1iMElMI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=davidgow.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=davidgow.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.29.242.92 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=davidgow.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=davidgow.net Received: by sphereful.davidgow.net (Postfix, from userid 119) id 14FEB1EAB64; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 21:33:12 +0800 (AWST) X-Spam-Level: Received: from [IPV6:2001:8003:8802:7000::9c4] (unknown [IPv6:2001:8003:8802:7000::9c4]) by sphereful.davidgow.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B86DF1EAB5E; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 21:33:08 +0800 (AWST) Message-ID: <097243a3-a75c-434e-b215-47a94e8677d2@davidgow.net> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 21:33:06 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sched: Increase drm_mock_sched_job_wait_finished timeout when CONFIG_HZ=100 To: Tvrtko Ursulin , phasta@kernel.org Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= , Danilo Krummrich , Matthew Brost , Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com References: <20260913084155.520015-2-david@davidgow.net> <0ce1883f-7de3-4a16-82f0-c8950459163e@davidgow.net> <26926372f9d375e1741b16abd2a910f3754a0410.camel@mailbox.org> From: David Gow Content-Language: fr In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 14/09/2026 à 8:12 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin a écrit : > > On 14/09/2026 12:48, Philipp Stanner wrote: >> On Mon, 2026-09-14 at 12:21 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >>> It's not a loss really to >>> skip the scheduling quality tests on more platforms than strictly >>> required so I'd say lets go with that. >> >> Does that mean you agree with my idea of having two options for >> building the tests, one for sanity and one for performance-ish things? > > A new kconfig? Makes sense. This sounds good to me (particularly if it's likely to extend to more than just the two tests). If they're behind a separate kconfig, there's no need on my end for these tests to support UML or other HZ=100 setups (though I don't think it's a _bad_ idea to have a more friendly skip or error in that case if you'd particularly like one). Thanks very much, -- David