From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM: EM: Move sched domains rebuild function from schedutil to EM
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 12:09:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <097bee29-64b5-444d-a3ae-81c2dcc35ae7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4977135.31r3eYUQgx@rjwysocki.net>
On 12/12/24 12:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Function sugov_eas_rebuild_sd() defined in the schedutil cpufreq governor
> implements generic functionality that may be useful in other places. In
> particular, there is a plan to use it in the intel_pstate driver in the
> future.
>
> For this reason, move it from schedutil to the energy model code and
> rename it to em_rebuild_sched_domains().
>
> This also helps to get rid of some #ifdeffery in schedutil which is a
> plus.
>
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
As already mentioned during the RFC, fine with me FWIW.
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-12 12:01 Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-12 12:09 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=097bee29-64b5-444d-a3ae-81c2dcc35ae7@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®