From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753149Ab2ISX7U (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:59:20 -0400 Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:56644 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752930Ab2ISX7S (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:59:18 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfee61a-b7f726d000000ec7-69-505a5c55493a From: Kukjin Kim To: "'Doug Anderson'" , "'Daniel Kurtz'" Cc: "'Russell King'" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Thomas Abraham'" , olofj@chromium.org References: <1346944864-12434-1-git-send-email-djkurtz@chromium.org> In-reply-to: Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: no duplicate mask/unmask in eint0_15 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:59:16 +0900 Message-id: <09aa01cd96c2$c6cedd00$546c9700$%kim@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-index: Ac2MRmfCvBinwOE7QNG0GEIUoZoZDAKfDalw Content-language: ko X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jAd3QmKgAg4t7OC0u75rDZjHj/D4m ByaPz5vkAhijuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDIWdnxiLnjLVdF2sIutgXEbRxcjJ4eEgIlE++pNzBC2 mMSFe+vZuhi5OIQEFjFKPJrZwwzh/GWUaDv5gQ2kik1AQ+Lw+2fsILaIQIjE2udtLCA2s8At RomNE70hGroZJSY0/QVLcAoES7TvOssKYgsLuEncv7kDbB2LgKrEvFszweK8ArYST6/vZoaw BSV+TL4HNVRLYv3O40wQtrzE5jVvgWo4gE5Vl3j0VxfiBiOJK013mCFKRCT2vXjHOIFRaBaS SbOQTJqFZNIsJC0LGFlWMYqmFiQXFCel5xrqFSfmFpfmpesl5+duYgQH9TOpHYwrGywOMQpw MCrx8HZIRAUIsSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuH9sTcyQIg3JbGyKrUoP76oNCe1+BCjNAeLkjiv8KfA ACGB9MSS1OzU1ILUIpgsEwenVANj+V3VxoB/TMXZQXYpZ5rLwqZ3Zsyr+Xx0wQv1axsefLp4 5f3OB8+MYi1X5Bk/tnLW9FNxq3O99IajrV431fTTZT6f/a/kln8QeVnlf4XZ7daPAO/Go98t +xmO+O/INVnkUy6kUs4/b9IxgVNias9+nu3STVzZ0PWwPb5yV830O35PD8bsEDyoxFKckWio xVxUnAgA5ttobWYCAAA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Doug Anderson wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > > chained_irq_enter/exit() already mask&ack/unmask the chained interrupt. > > There is no need to also explicitly do it in the handler. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 7 ------- > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach- > exynos/common.c > > index 4eb39cd..0a85aec 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > > @@ -965,14 +965,7 @@ static void exynos_irq_eint0_15(unsigned int irq, > struct irq_desc *desc) > > struct irq_chip *chip = irq_get_chip(irq); > > > > chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); > > - chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data); > > - > > - if (chip->irq_ack) > > - chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data); > > - > > generic_handle_irq(*irq_data); > > - > > - chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data); > > chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); > > } > > > > -- > > 1.7.7.3 > > > > Acked-by: Doug Anderson Yes, will apply. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.