mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: "Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>,
	Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>,
	Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] cpuset: settle isolation state when CPUs are given back to parent
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 09:51:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <09c033dd-41dc-4503-9def-4e662e946dc4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261107120100.3587595-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev>

On 11/7/26 7:00 AM, Ridong Chen wrote:
> From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
>
> partition_xcpus_del() only updates isolated_cpus when the partition that
> gives back the CPUs has a different state than its parent. CPUs that were
> further distributed to descendant isolated partitions are not taken into
> account, so isolated_cpus_release() has to be called afterwards in
> several places to walk up the ancestors and fix isolated_cpus.
>
> Make partition_xcpus_del() always set the isolation state of the given
> back CPUs to the state of the parent that receives them. As the
> effective_xcpus of a partition covers the CPUs distributed to its
> descendants, the isolation state of those CPUs is settled at the same
> time. Boot-time isolated CPUs are still preserved by isolated_cpu_update().
>
> compute_partition_effective_cpumask() invalidates a child partition
> without going through partition_xcpus_del(), so do the same there: the
> CPUs of the invalidated child take the isolation state of its parent.
>
> As the parent may be shrunk and its effective_xcpus not updated yet,
> only do so for the CPUs the parent still owns. This is to keep the
> isolation state correct for now, the in-place invalidation here will be
> removed later in the partition rework.
>
> isolated_cpus_update() assumes the old and new states are different,
> which no longer holds now that partition_xcpus_del() proceeds regardless
> of the states. Drop its @old_prs argument and the WARN_ON_ONCE() so that
> it simply sets the isolation state of the given CPUs, and use it
> everywhere. The state check in partition_xcpus_add() is dropped as well,
> as setting the state is a no-op when the states are the same.
>
> isolated_cpus_release() is no longer needed and is removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 98 ++++++++----------------------------------
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 85e5b529d144..fc9de6e16ff5 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1244,17 +1244,17 @@ static bool isolated_cpu_update(int new_prs, int cpu)
>   }
>   
>   /*
> - * isolated_cpus_update - Update the isolated_cpus mask
> - * @old_prs: old partition_root_state
> - * @new_prs: new partition_root_state
> - * @xcpus: exclusive CPUs with state change
> + * isolated_cpus_update - Set the isolation state of @xcpus
> + * @new_prs: partition root state that @xcpus will belong to
> + * @xcpus: exclusive CPUs whose isolation state may change
> + *
> + * CPUs isolated at boot time are kept isolated.
>    */
> -static void isolated_cpus_update(int old_prs, int new_prs, struct cpumask *xcpus)
> +static void isolated_cpus_update(int new_prs, struct cpumask *xcpus)
>   {
>   	bool updated = false;
>   	int cpu;
>   
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(old_prs == new_prs);
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&callback_lock);
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&cpuset_mutex);
>   	for_each_cpu(cpu, xcpus)
> @@ -1263,45 +1263,6 @@ static void isolated_cpus_update(int old_prs, int new_prs, struct cpumask *xcpus
>   		update_housekeeping = true;
>   }
>   
> -/*
> - * isolated_cpus_release - Remove the relevant CPUs in @xcpus from isolated_cpus
> - * @cs: the current cpuset
> - * @xcpus: the set of effective xcpus to be considered for removal
> - *
> - * This function is called when an isolated partition is invalidated or when
> - * some of its effective xcpus are to be removed from isolated_cpus due to
> - * changes in parent cpuset. The given @xcpus must be modifiable as the function
> - * will update its value to determine the right set of CPUs to be removed.
> - */
> -static void isolated_cpus_release(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *xcpus)
> -{
> -	struct cpuset *ancestor = parent_cs(cs);
> -	struct cpuset *iancestor = NULL;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Search the furthest isolated partition root ancestor available
> -	 * until top_cpuset or a remote partition root is hit.
> -	 */
> -	for (; ancestor; ancestor = parent_cs(ancestor)) {
> -		if (ancestor->partition_root_state == PRS_ISOLATED)
> -			iancestor = ancestor;
> -		if (is_remote_partition(ancestor))
> -			break;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If a furthest isolated partition acnestor is found, use it to
> -	 * determine which of the CPUs in @xcpus should be removed from
> -	 * isolated_cpus. Otherwise, all of them will be removed.
> -	 */
> -	if (iancestor && !cpumask_andnot(xcpus, xcpus, iancestor->effective_xcpus))
> -		return; /* No CPU should be removed from isolated_cpus */
> -
> -	spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> -	isolated_cpus_update(PRS_ISOLATED, PRS_ROOT, xcpus);
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
> -}
> -
>   /*
>    * partition_xcpus_add - Add new exclusive CPUs to partition
>    * @new_prs: new partition_root_state
> @@ -1325,9 +1286,7 @@ static void partition_xcpus_add(int new_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
>   	if (parent == &top_cpuset)
>   		cpumask_or(subpartitions_cpus, subpartitions_cpus, xcpus);
>   
> -	if (new_prs != parent->partition_root_state)
> -		isolated_cpus_update(parent->partition_root_state, new_prs,
> -				     xcpus);
> +	isolated_cpus_update(new_prs, xcpus);
>   
>   	cpumask_andnot(parent->effective_cpus, parent->effective_cpus, xcpus);
>   }
> @@ -1355,9 +1314,8 @@ static void partition_xcpus_del(int old_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
>   	if (parent == &top_cpuset)
>   		cpumask_andnot(subpartitions_cpus, subpartitions_cpus, xcpus);
>   
> -	if (old_prs != parent->partition_root_state)
> -		isolated_cpus_update(old_prs, parent->partition_root_state,
> -				     xcpus);
> +	/* CPUs given back, including those of descendants, take parent's state */
> +	isolated_cpus_update(parent->partition_root_state, xcpus);
>   
>   	cpumask_or(parent->effective_cpus, parent->effective_cpus, xcpus);
>   	cpumask_and(parent->effective_cpus, parent->effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask);
> @@ -1612,6 +1570,7 @@ static void compute_partition_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs,
>   	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
>   	struct cpuset *child;
>   	bool populated = partition_is_populated(cs, NULL);
> +	static cpumask_t xcpus;		/* Protected by cpuset_mutex */
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Check child partition roots to see if they should be invalidated
> @@ -1640,14 +1599,15 @@ static void compute_partition_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs,
>   			int parent_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
>   
>   			/*
> -			 * Invalidate child partition and update isolated_cpus
> -			 * if necessary.
> +			 * Invalidate child partition. Its CPUs still owned by
> +			 * cs take the isolation state of cs. effective_xcpus
> +			 * of cs may not be updated yet, so recompute it.
>   			 */
>   			spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
>   			WRITE_ONCE(child->prs_err, PERR_NOCPUS);
> -			if ((old_prs == PRS_ISOLATED) && (parent_prs == PRS_ROOT))
> -				isolated_cpus_update(PRS_ISOLATED, PRS_ROOT,
> -						     child->effective_xcpus);
> +			compute_excpus(cs, &xcpus);
> +			cpumask_and(&xcpus, &xcpus, child->effective_xcpus);
> +			isolated_cpus_update(parent_prs, &xcpus);
>   			child->partition_root_state = -old_prs;
>   			spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
>   			notify_partition_change(child, old_prs);
> @@ -2080,22 +2040,8 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
>   		 *
>   		 * A partition error happens when parent has tasks and all
>   		 * its effective CPUs will have to be distributed out.
> -		 *
> -		 * For an isolated partition with a shrunk root partition parent
> -		 * we may need to return some or all of its isolated CPUs.
>   		 */
>   		nocpu |= cpumask_empty(tmp->delmask);
> -		if ((parent_prs == PRS_ROOT) && (old_prs == PRS_ISOLATED)) {
> -			cpumask_clear(tmp->addmask);
> -			if (nocpu)
> -				cpumask_copy(tmp->addmask, cs->effective_xcpus);
> -			else if (!cpumask_subset(cs->effective_xcpus, parent->effective_xcpus))
> -				cpumask_andnot(tmp->addmask, cs->effective_xcpus,
> -							     parent->effective_xcpus);
> -			if (!cpumask_empty(tmp->addmask))
> -				isolated_cpus_release(cs, tmp->addmask);
> -			/* Expansion of parent's effective_xcpus is handled below */
> -		}
>   		if (nocpu) {
>   			part_error = PERR_NOCPUS;
>   			if (is_partition_valid(cs))
> @@ -2341,18 +2287,12 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp,
>   				/*
>   				 * When parent is not a valid partition root,
>   				 * child partition roots become invalid too.
> -				 *
> -				 * For a to be invalidated isolated partition,
> -				 * call return_isolated_cpus() to remove the
> -				 * relevant CPUs from isolated_cpus.
> +				 * The isolation state of their CPUs has been
> +				 * settled when the parent gave them back.
>   				 */
>   				if (is_partition_valid(cp))
>   					new_prs = -old_prs;
>   
> -				if (old_prs == PRS_ISOLATED) {
> -					cpumask_copy(tmp->delmask, cp->effective_xcpus);
> -					isolated_cpus_release(cp, tmp->delmask);
> -				}
>   				WRITE_ONCE(cp->prs_err,
>   					   is_partition_invalid(parent)
>   					   ? PERR_INVPARENT : PERR_NOTPART);
> @@ -3108,7 +3048,7 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
>   	if (!is_partition_valid(cs))
>   		reset_partition_data(cs);
>   	else if (isolcpus_updated)
> -		isolated_cpus_update(old_prs, new_prs, cs->effective_xcpus);
> +		isolated_cpus_update(new_prs, cs->effective_xcpus);
>   	spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
>   
>   	/* Force update if partition is disabled & update effective_xcpus */

The code change looks good to me. However this is not just a code 
restructuring, it also includes a bug fix. I wonder if we should clarify 
that and maybe add a Fixes tag.

Cheers,
Longman


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-09 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-07 12:00 [PATCH v3 0/4] cpuset: preparatory fixes and cleanups for partition rework Ridong Chen
2026-11-07 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] cgroup/cpuset: Reset partition data when an invalid partition stays invalid Ridong Chen
2026-11-09 14:59   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-11-07 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] cpuset: add early empty cpumask check in partition_xcpus_add/del Ridong Chen
2026-11-07 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] cpuset: settle isolation state when CPUs are given back to parent Ridong Chen
2026-11-09 14:51   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-11-09 15:20   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-11-07 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] cpuset: generalize the validate_partition() interface Ridong Chen
2026-11-09 14:52   ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=09c033dd-41dc-4503-9def-4e662e946dc4@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
    --cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®