From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] iommu: Avoid introducing more races
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:19:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09d901ad11b3a410fbb6e27f7d04ad4609c3fe4a.1741706365.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> (raw)
Although the lock-juggling is only a temporary workaround, we don't want
it to make things avoidably worse. Jason was right to be nervous, since
bus_iommu_probe() doesn't care *which* IOMMU instance it's probing for,
so it probably is possible for one walk to finish a probe which a
different walk started, thus we do want to check for that.
Also there's no need to drop the lock just to have of_iommu_configure()
do nothing when a fwspec already exists; check that directly and avoid
opening a window at all in that (still somewhat likely) case.
Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
---
I was rather expecting to send a v3 of "iommu: Get DT/ACPI parsing into
the proper probe path", so I'm grateful that v2 was picked up, thanks!
This is the difference as a fix/squash commit instead.
---
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index d824fa5166e3..c6d40abe577e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -415,13 +415,15 @@ static int iommu_init_device(struct device *dev)
* is buried in the bus dma_configure path. Properly unpicking that is
* still a big job, so for now just invoke the whole thing. The device
* already having a driver bound means dma_configure has already run and
- * either found no IOMMU to wait for, or we're in its replay call right
- * now, so either way there's no point calling it again.
+ * found no IOMMU to wait for, so there's no point calling it again.
*/
- if (!dev->driver && dev->bus->dma_configure) {
+ if (!dev->iommu->fwspec && !dev->driver && dev->bus->dma_configure) {
mutex_unlock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
dev->bus->dma_configure(dev);
mutex_lock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
+ /* If another instance finished the job for us, skip it */
+ if (!dev->iommu || dev->iommu_group)
+ return -ENODEV;
}
/*
* At this point, relevant devices either now have a fwspec which will
--
2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-11 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-11 15:19 Robin Murphy [this message]
2025-03-20 19:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-04-17 14:31 ` Joerg Roedel
2025-05-22 9:59 ` Johan Hovold
2025-05-22 16:54 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09d901ad11b3a410fbb6e27f7d04ad4609c3fe4a.1741706365.git.robin.murphy@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®