From: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Ajay Singh <ajay.kathat@microchip.com>,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/cfg80211.c:361:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:42:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09eeb7d4-c922-45ee-a1ac-59942153dbce@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a5uatfl1.fsf@kernel.org>
Hello Ajay, Kalle,
On 8/29/23 10:31, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> writes:
>
>> kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> writes:
[...]
>>> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>>>>> drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/cfg80211.c:361:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int key_mgmt_suite @@ got restricted __be32 [usertype] @@
>>> drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/cfg80211.c:361:42: sparse: expected unsigned int key_mgmt_suite
>>> drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/cfg80211.c:361:42: sparse: got restricted __be32 [usertype]
>>
>> Yeah, this is an old issue but we really should try to fix this,
>> especially so as I would like to make wireless code sparse warning free
>> in the near future. IIRC there were some problems with nl80211 interface
>> as well so this might not be simple fix still.
>
> For reference here's the old discussion:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220720160302.231516-1-ajay.kathat@microchip.com/
>
> Any volunteers to help fix this? I would prefers fixes for issues like
> this compared to questionable random cleanups we always get.
I'm bumping this old thread because it looks like the sparse warning is still
present in WILC driver, and I would gladly help getting rid of it, but since
there's already been a fair amount of discussions around it, I am not sure what
is expected/what should be done. Here is my understanding so far:
- Ajay has proposed a patch ([1]) which indeed fixes the warning but involves
many casts
- Johannes and Jouni then gave details about the original issue leading to those
casts ([2]): wpa_supplicant somehow forces the AKM suites values to be be32 at
some point, while it should be treated in host endianness
- as pointed by Ajay, the corresponding fix has been made since then by Jouni in
wpa_supplicant ([3]). The fix make sure to handle key_mgmt_suite in host
endianness AND to keep compatibility with current drivers having the be32 fix. -
- It could have allowed to simply get rid of the all casts on AKM suites in
wilc driver ([4]), but then new kernel/drivers would break with existing
userspace, so it is not an option
Now, I see multiple options to fix the sparse warning:
- apply the same fix as for wpa_supplicant ([3]) in wilc driver (so basically,
become compatible with both endianness)
- apply the same fix as for wpa_supplicant ([3]), not in wilc but in nl80211
(may need to update not only wilc but any driver having trailing be32 cast on
AKM suites)
- take the initial quick but not-so-nice double cast fix and call it a day
What's your opinion on this ?
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20220720160302.231516-1-ajay.kathat@microchip.com/
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/e677e3cd1b5c34146017a65f28fabdb673a91d23.camel@sipsolutions.net/
[3] https://w1.fi/cgit/hostap/commit/?id=8392ea9e75eacf30cb09671e463d9a37c3eadd6a
[4]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20230830042300.87184-1-ajay.kathat@microchip.com/
--
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-14 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-28 22:56 kernel test robot
2023-08-29 6:09 ` Kalle Valo
2023-08-29 8:31 ` Kalle Valo
2023-08-30 0:34 ` Ajay.Kathat
2024-02-14 8:42 ` Alexis Lothoré [this message]
2024-02-14 9:29 ` Johannes Berg
2024-02-14 11:03 ` Alexis Lothoré
2024-02-14 11:28 ` Johannes Berg
2024-02-15 4:10 ` Ajay.Kathat
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-11-05 8:00 kernel test robot
2023-10-05 13:11 kernel test robot
2023-04-26 19:15 kernel test robot
2023-01-22 8:12 kernel test robot
2023-01-12 16:05 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09eeb7d4-c922-45ee-a1ac-59942153dbce@bootlin.com \
--to=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=ajay.kathat@microchip.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome