From: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
To: Mike Tipton <mdtipton@codeaurora.org>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] interconnect: qcom: Fix small BW votes being truncated to zero
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 14:11:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09f21847-33bc-64fb-aeb7-df5bafa5593c@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200623040814.23791-5-mdtipton@codeaurora.org>
Hi Mike,
On 6/23/20 07:08, Mike Tipton wrote:
> Small BW votes that translate to less than a single BCM unit are
> currently truncated to zero. Ensure that non-zero BW requests always
> result in at least a vote of 1 to BCM.
>
> Fixes: 976daac4a1c5 ("interconnect: qcom: Consolidate interconnect RPMh support")
> Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <mdtipton@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/interconnect/qcom/bcm-voter.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/bcm-voter.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/bcm-voter.c
> index a68c858ca6b7..9e2612fe7fad 100644
> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/bcm-voter.c
> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/bcm-voter.c
> @@ -54,8 +54,20 @@ static int cmp_vcd(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static u64 bcm_div(u64 num, u64 base)
> +{
> + /* Ensure that small votes aren't lost. */
> + if (num && num < base)
> + return 1;
> +
> + do_div(num, base);
do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, which will truncate these to 32-bit.
> +
> + return num;
> +}
> +
> static void bcm_aggregate(struct qcom_icc_bcm *bcm)
> {
> + struct qcom_icc_node *node;
> size_t i, bucket;
> u64 agg_avg[QCOM_ICC_NUM_BUCKETS] = {0};
> u64 agg_peak[QCOM_ICC_NUM_BUCKETS] = {0};
> @@ -63,22 +75,21 @@ static void bcm_aggregate(struct qcom_icc_bcm *bcm)
>
> for (bucket = 0; bucket < QCOM_ICC_NUM_BUCKETS; bucket++) {
> for (i = 0; i < bcm->num_nodes; i++) {
> - temp = bcm->nodes[i]->sum_avg[bucket] * bcm->aux_data.width;
> - do_div(temp, bcm->nodes[i]->buswidth * bcm->nodes[i]->channels);
> + node = bcm->nodes[i];
> + temp = bcm_div(node->sum_avg[bucket] * bcm->aux_data.width,
> + node->buswidth * node->channels);
> agg_avg[bucket] = max(agg_avg[bucket], temp);
>
> - temp = bcm->nodes[i]->max_peak[bucket] * bcm->aux_data.width;
> - do_div(temp, bcm->nodes[i]->buswidth);
> + temp = bcm_div(node->max_peak[bucket] * bcm->aux_data.width,
> + node->buswidth);
> agg_peak[bucket] = max(agg_peak[bucket], temp);
> }
>
> temp = agg_avg[bucket] * bcm->vote_scale;
> - do_div(temp, bcm->aux_data.unit);
> - bcm->vote_x[bucket] = temp;
> + bcm->vote_x[bucket] = bcm_div(temp, bcm->aux_data.unit);
>
> temp = agg_peak[bucket] * bcm->vote_scale;
> - do_div(temp, bcm->aux_data.unit);
> - bcm->vote_y[bucket] = temp;
> + bcm->vote_y[bucket] = bcm_div(temp, bcm->aux_data.unit);
> }
>
> if (bcm->keepalive && bcm->vote_x[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC] == 0 &&
>
The rest looks good.
Thanks,
Georgi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-02 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-23 4:08 [PATCH 0/4] interconnect: qcom: Misc bcm-voter changes and fixes Mike Tipton
2020-06-23 4:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] interconnect: qcom: Support bcm-voter-specific TCS wait behavior Mike Tipton
2020-07-02 9:02 ` Georgi Djakov
2020-07-02 21:01 ` Mike Tipton
2020-06-23 4:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] interconnect: qcom: Only wait for completion in AMC/WAKE by default Mike Tipton
2020-06-23 4:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] interconnect: qcom: Add support for per-BCM scaling factors Mike Tipton
2020-06-23 4:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] interconnect: qcom: Fix small BW votes being truncated to zero Mike Tipton
2020-07-02 11:11 ` Georgi Djakov [this message]
2020-07-02 21:02 ` Mike Tipton
2020-07-06 16:45 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09f21847-33bc-64fb-aeb7-df5bafa5593c@linaro.org \
--to=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdtipton@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®