From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751330AbaCVSnz (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:43:55 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:47978 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750915AbaCVSnw (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:43:52 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,710,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="504624414" From: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" To: Ben Hutchings , Andreas Sturmlechner CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "Berg, Johannes" , Jianguo Wu , Andres Bertens , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH 3.4 93/99] iwlwifi: always copy first 16 bytes of commands Thread-Topic: Re: [PATCH 3.4 93/99] iwlwifi: always copy first 16 bytes of commands Thread-Index: AQHPRdoW0et51Pum40mA9yw1VIjQJ5rtKVCAgAAA2ACAAAaggIAADPWAgAAzQfA= Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:43:47 +0000 Message-ID: <0BA3FCBA62E2DC44AF3030971E174FB303DB6D18@HASMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20140308010611.468206150@linuxfoundation.org> <8891481.xyaW2OauMW@tux200s> <20140322162501.GA13385@kroah.com> <174441141.AshFyuFNQG@tux200s> <20140322165145.GA12870@kroah.com> <1395509887.2770.72.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1395509887.2770.72.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.184.70.13] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id s2MIiJaS007554 > On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:51 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 05:28:02PM +0100, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > > Original Message from: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > > > > > > > > Does Linus's tree also have this problem for you? Or does it work > > > > there? If it works there, perhaps we just missed backporting > > > > something to 3.4? > > > > > > > > > > Other trouble aside, iwlwifi works fine - writing this from today's > > > build of 3.14.0-rc7+. > > > > Hm. Any linux-wifi developers have an idea? I can always just revert > > this patch, but finding out the root cause would be nice... Reverting the patch is obviously the first thing to do. Finding the root would be nice but I am afraid the time won't allow it... In any case, this patch is meant to avoid a few DMAR fault and possibly some calibration mismatch upon suspend resume. Nothing critical in my eyes. > > Andreas, could you test whether this regression is also present in 3.2.55? > This patch is based on my backport for 3.2.y. > > Ben. > > -- > Ben Hutchings > I'm not a reverse psychological virus. Please don't copy me into your sig. {.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I