From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263134AbVFXXMZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:12:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263133AbVFXXMZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:12:25 -0400 Received: from smtpout.mac.com ([17.250.248.46]:26366 "EHLO smtpout.mac.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263134AbVFXXI4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:08:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050623235634.GC14426@waste.org> References: <42B9E536.60704@pobox.com> <20050623235634.GC14426@waste.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0C5DEAF8-11D3-4F12-9482-6DFEE099A392@mac.com> Cc: Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel , Git Mailing List , mercurial@selenic.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kyle Moffett Subject: Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:08:42 -0400 To: Matt Mackall X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Jun 23, 2005, at 19:56:34, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 06:24:54PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Things in git-land are moving at lightning speed, and usability has >> improved a lot since my post a month ago: http://lkml.org/lkml/ >> 2005/5/26/11 > > And here's a quick comparison with the current state of Mercurial.. Oooh!!! Nice!!! This is my new official source keeper for my next project. I especially like the fast operation and low disk storage requirements. Many kudos to Matt Mackall for his awesome program! The efficient network protocol is great too! Cheers, Kyle Moffett -- There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- C.A.R. Hoare