From: Shesha Sreenivasamurthy <sheshas@gmail.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hot ADD using CXL1.1 host
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 07:19:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0D3A81E2-C99A-491D-AB66-FC6005E38667@gmail.com> (raw)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 2:00 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Shesha, Linux email expectations are to not top post, i.e. respond
> inline, like below:
>
> Shesha Sreenivasamurthy wrote:
>> The re-configuration does not reset the device. It does re-program the PCIe
>> DVSEC for CXL Device register (Section 8.1.3 CXL 2.0 spec Pg 258), register
>> (DVSEC vendor ID 0x1E98, DCSEC ID 0x0).
>> “So you need to dynamically recreate the region, especially if your step 10
>> above resets the device.”
>> Do you mean the DAX region ?
>
> No, I mean the CXL region.
>
>> If so, I can if the system stays up. After a few seconds the system
>> crashes. Can the crash be because of a mismatch between DVSEC
>> information with what kernel was informed by BIOS during boot (Some
>> ACPI tables ?)
>
> My concern is that the platform memory decode configuration is not
> prepared for the CXL device to claim more than what was originally
> programmed in the CXL DVSEC range registers. One of the platform
> firmware updates for CXL 2.0 was the creation of the CFMWS (CXL Fixed
> Memory Window Structure) in the ACPI CEDT (CXL Early Discovery Table).
> That structure indicates which platform address ranges decode to which
> CXL host bridges. Those windows are defined in platform specific
> registersi (not enumerated to the OS). If the window is only 8GB then
> the endpoint device can not decode more. You would need to reboot to get
> the BIOS to allocate more host address space for CXL.
>
> The expectation for newer platforms is that platform firmware define
> CFMWS such that there is spare capacity in the address map for the OS to
> dynmaically map more CXL.
There seems to be some instability in using DAX. When the system is given all the device memory using efi=nosoftreserve, the stressapptest (https://github.com/stressapptest/stressapptest) runs for an extended period of time. However, when the system is booted without efi=nosoftreserve, and assigned the special purpose memory to system-ram using daxctl, the system crashes after some time (20-30 mins). Is there any known instabilities when using DAX?
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-31 15:19 Shesha Sreenivasamurthy [this message]
2023-01-31 17:07 ` Dan Williams
[not found] <DM6PR18MB28441B6B542B2A59CF39BF6DAFCE9@DM6PR18MB2844.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <DM6PR18MB2844505042F7EDCF69CE08DBAFD39@DM6PR18MB2844.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
2023-01-30 20:31 ` Dan Williams
2023-01-30 21:19 ` Shesha Sreenivasamurthy
[not found] ` <CABL7MgHENj0FcT+whjdskOmqPfNa0zo8gQobpZ0mrW3a3NY_pA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-01-30 22:00 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0D3A81E2-C99A-491D-AB66-FC6005E38667@gmail.com \
--to=sheshas@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®