From: Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@nvidia.com>
To: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Edward Srouji <edwards@nvidia.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Maher Sanalla <msanalla@nvidia.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>, Shay Drori <shayd@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2] net/mlx5: Lag, split aggregate speed into oper and max helpers
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 18:44:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a1daf0f-a71c-4b06-bc7b-9a1a2d6d6d08@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179078810510.31693.8484299734852796324@kernel.org>
On 30/09/2026 20:08, netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> Hi!
>
> This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
> commit messages seem to be missing some information:
>
> - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
> development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
> analysis tool scan.
>
> - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
> (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
> the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
>
> - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please
> mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for
> testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware.
>
> Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
> reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
> can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
> other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
> then.
>
> The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
> that is the case please reply and explain.
The bugs were discovered during integration and reproduced on a
back-to-back ConnectX-8 setup.
The first bug (stale oper speed when link goes down) was observed: after
the link partner disconnected, the aggregate TX speed reported to vports
remained full speed because firmware still returned the last oper speed,
causing vports to be rate-limited to the old aggregate speed.
The second bug (active-backup summing all port speeds instead of the
active port's speed) was also triggered: in active-backup mode the
computed aggregate was double the expected value since both port speeds
were summed even though only one port was active.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 17:04 Tariq Toukan
2026-09-30 17:08 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-05 15:44 ` Or Har-Toov [this message]
2026-10-05 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a1daf0f-a71c-4b06-bc7b-9a1a2d6d6d08@nvidia.com \
--to=ohartoov@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=edwards@nvidia.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=msanalla@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®