Re: [PATCH] unroll: Make unrolled, unrolled_full and unrolled_none function-like

[Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>]

From: Tzu-Ching Yang <shingekinocore@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 10:56:13 +0800

> unrolled, unrolled_full and unrolled_none are object-like macros with

Because those are attributes. With function-like names such patterns:

unrolled()
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)

are counter-intuitive and confusing.

We have either plain-named attributes like `notrace` (BTW what if you
name your variable as `notrace`?) or underscored like `__always_inline`.
If you really need to name your variables `unrolled`, then I'd expect
changing these macros to `__unrolled` etc, not to `unrolled()`.
Although I'm not sure we really need it, there's tons of such macros in
the kernel -- try naming your variable `current`.

> lower-case names, so in a file that includes <linux/unroll.h> every
> later identifier with one of these names is replaced with a _Pragma()
> operator. A local variable or struct member with one of these names
Thanks,
Olek