mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
	chuck.lever@oracle.com, jlayton@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de,
	kolga@netapp.com, Dai.Ngo@oracle.com, tom@talpey.com,
	paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
	zohar@linux.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com,
	eric.snowberg@oracle.com, dhowells@redhat.com, jarkko@kernel.org,
	stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, eparis@parisplace.org,
	shuah@kernel.org, mic@digikod.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 23/25] evm: Make it independent from 'integrity' LSM
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:39:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a5b99b9-0839-4f76-abb4-1fc9e5a6cb49@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240115181809.885385-24-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>

On 1/15/2024 10:18 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
>
> Define a new structure for EVM-specific metadata, called evm_iint_cache,
> and embed it in the inode security blob. Introduce evm_iint_inode() to
> retrieve metadata, and register evm_inode_alloc_security() for the
> inode_alloc_security LSM hook, to initialize the structure (before
> splitting metadata, this task was done by iint_init_always()).
>
> Keep the non-NULL checks after calling evm_iint_inode() except in
> evm_inode_alloc_security(), to take into account inodes for which
> security_inode_alloc() was not called. When using shared metadata,
> obtaining a NULL pointer from integrity_iint_find() meant that the file
> wasn't in the IMA policy. Now, because IMA and EVM use disjoint metadata,
> the EVM status has to be stored for every inode regardless of the IMA
> policy.
>
> Given that from now on EVM relies on its own metadata, remove the iint
> parameter from evm_verifyxattr(). Also, directly retrieve the iint in
> evm_verify_hmac(), called by both evm_verifyxattr() and
> evm_verify_current_integrity(), since now there is no performance penalty
> in retrieving EVM metadata (constant time).
>
> Replicate the management of the IMA_NEW_FILE flag, by introducing
> evm_post_path_mknod() and evm_file_release() to respectively set and clear
> the newly introduced flag EVM_NEW_FILE, at the same time IMA does. Like for
> IMA, select CONFIG_SECURITY_PATH when EVM is enabled, to ensure that files
> are marked as new.
>
> Unlike ima_post_path_mknod(), evm_post_path_mknod() cannot check if a file
> must be appraised. Thus, it marks all affected files. Also, it does not
> clear EVM_NEW_FILE depending on i_version, but that is not a problem
> because IMA_NEW_FILE is always cleared when set in ima_check_last_writer().
>
> Move the EVM-specific flag EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG to
> security/integrity/evm/evm.h, since that definition is now unnecessary in
> the common integrity layer.
>
> Finally, switch to the LSM reservation mechanism for the EVM xattr, and
> consequently decrement by one the number of xattrs to allocate in
> security_inode_init_security().
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/evm.h                   |  8 +--
>  security/integrity/evm/Kconfig        |  1 +
>  security/integrity/evm/evm.h          | 19 +++++++
>  security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c   |  4 +-
>  security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c     | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c |  2 +-
>  security/integrity/integrity.h        |  1 -
>  security/security.c                   |  4 +-
>  8 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/evm.h b/include/linux/evm.h
> index cb481eccc967..d48d6da32315 100644
> --- a/include/linux/evm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/evm.h
> @@ -12,15 +12,12 @@
>  #include <linux/integrity.h>
>  #include <linux/xattr.h>
>  
> -struct integrity_iint_cache;
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_EVM
>  extern int evm_set_key(void *key, size_t keylen);
>  extern enum integrity_status evm_verifyxattr(struct dentry *dentry,
>  					     const char *xattr_name,
>  					     void *xattr_value,
> -					     size_t xattr_value_len,
> -					     struct integrity_iint_cache *iint);
> +					     size_t xattr_value_len);
>  int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
>  			    const struct qstr *qstr, struct xattr *xattrs,
>  			    int *xattr_count);
> @@ -48,8 +45,7 @@ static inline int evm_set_key(void *key, size_t keylen)
>  static inline enum integrity_status evm_verifyxattr(struct dentry *dentry,
>  						    const char *xattr_name,
>  						    void *xattr_value,
> -						    size_t xattr_value_len,
> -					struct integrity_iint_cache *iint)
> +						    size_t xattr_value_len)
>  {
>  	return INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>  }
> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/Kconfig b/security/integrity/evm/Kconfig
> index fba9ee359bc9..861b3bacab82 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/evm/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/Kconfig
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ config EVM
>  	select CRYPTO_HMAC
>  	select CRYPTO_SHA1
>  	select CRYPTO_HASH_INFO
> +	select SECURITY_PATH
>  	default n
>  	help
>  	  EVM protects a file's security extended attributes against
> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm.h b/security/integrity/evm/evm.h
> index 53bd7fec93fa..eb1a2c343bd7 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,25 @@ struct xattr_list {
>  	bool enabled;
>  };
>  
> +#define EVM_NEW_FILE			0x00000001
> +#define EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG		0x00000002
> +
> +/* EVM integrity metadata associated with an inode */
> +struct evm_iint_cache {
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	enum integrity_status evm_status:4;
> +};
> +
> +extern struct lsm_blob_sizes evm_blob_sizes;
> +
> +static inline struct evm_iint_cache *evm_iint_inode(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	if (unlikely(!inode->i_security))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	return inode->i_security + evm_blob_sizes.lbs_inode;
> +}
> +
>  extern int evm_initialized;
>  
>  #define EVM_ATTR_FSUUID		0x0001
> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
> index b1ffd4cc0b44..7552d49d0725 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
> @@ -322,10 +322,10 @@ int evm_calc_hash(struct dentry *dentry, const char *req_xattr_name,
>  static int evm_is_immutable(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
>  {
>  	const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_data = NULL;
> -	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
> +	struct evm_iint_cache *iint;
>  	int rc = 0;
>  
> -	iint = integrity_iint_find(inode);
> +	iint = evm_iint_inode(inode);
>  	if (iint && (iint->flags & EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG))
>  		return 1;
>  
> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> index f65dbf3e9256..14c8f38e61d6 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> @@ -178,14 +178,14 @@ static int is_unsupported_fs(struct dentry *dentry)
>  static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry,
>  					     const char *xattr_name,
>  					     char *xattr_value,
> -					     size_t xattr_value_len,
> -					     struct integrity_iint_cache *iint)
> +					     size_t xattr_value_len)
>  {
>  	struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_data = NULL;
>  	struct signature_v2_hdr *hdr;
>  	enum integrity_status evm_status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
>  	struct evm_digest digest;
> -	struct inode *inode;
> +	struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
> +	struct evm_iint_cache *iint = evm_iint_inode(inode);
>  	int rc, xattr_len, evm_immutable = 0;
>  
>  	if (iint && (iint->evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS ||
> @@ -254,8 +254,6 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry,
>  					(const char *)xattr_data, xattr_len,
>  					digest.digest, digest.hdr.length);
>  		if (!rc) {
> -			inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
> -
>  			if (xattr_data->type == EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG) {
>  				if (iint)
>  					iint->flags |= EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG;
> @@ -403,7 +401,6 @@ int evm_read_protected_xattrs(struct dentry *dentry, u8 *buffer,
>   * @xattr_name: requested xattr
>   * @xattr_value: requested xattr value
>   * @xattr_value_len: requested xattr value length
> - * @iint: inode integrity metadata
>   *
>   * Calculate the HMAC for the given dentry and verify it against the stored
>   * security.evm xattr. For performance, use the xattr value and length
> @@ -416,8 +413,7 @@ int evm_read_protected_xattrs(struct dentry *dentry, u8 *buffer,
>   */
>  enum integrity_status evm_verifyxattr(struct dentry *dentry,
>  				      const char *xattr_name,
> -				      void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len,
> -				      struct integrity_iint_cache *iint)
> +				      void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len)
>  {
>  	if (!evm_key_loaded() || !evm_protected_xattr(xattr_name))
>  		return INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> @@ -425,13 +421,8 @@ enum integrity_status evm_verifyxattr(struct dentry *dentry,
>  	if (is_unsupported_fs(dentry))
>  		return INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>  
> -	if (!iint) {
> -		iint = integrity_iint_find(d_backing_inode(dentry));
> -		if (!iint)
> -			return INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> -	}
>  	return evm_verify_hmac(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value,
> -				 xattr_value_len, iint);
> +				 xattr_value_len);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(evm_verifyxattr);
>  
> @@ -448,7 +439,7 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_current_integrity(struct dentry *dentry)
>  
>  	if (!evm_key_loaded() || !S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || evm_fixmode)
>  		return INTEGRITY_PASS;
> -	return evm_verify_hmac(dentry, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL);
> +	return evm_verify_hmac(dentry, NULL, NULL, 0);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -526,14 +517,14 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
>  
>  	evm_status = evm_verify_current_integrity(dentry);
>  	if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS) {
> -		struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
> +		struct evm_iint_cache *iint;
>  
>  		/* Exception if the HMAC is not going to be calculated. */
>  		if (evm_hmac_disabled())
>  			return 0;
>  
> -		iint = integrity_iint_find(d_backing_inode(dentry));
> -		if (iint && (iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE))
> +		iint = evm_iint_inode(d_backing_inode(dentry));
> +		if (iint && (iint->flags & EVM_NEW_FILE))
>  			return 0;
>  
>  		/* exception for pseudo filesystems */
> @@ -735,9 +726,9 @@ static int evm_inode_remove_acl(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry,
>  
>  static void evm_reset_status(struct inode *inode)
>  {
> -	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
> +	struct evm_iint_cache *iint;
>  
> -	iint = integrity_iint_find(inode);
> +	iint = evm_iint_inode(inode);
>  	if (iint)
>  		iint->evm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>  }
> @@ -1019,6 +1010,42 @@ int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(evm_inode_init_security);
>  
> +static int evm_inode_alloc_security(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	struct evm_iint_cache *iint = evm_iint_inode(inode);
> +
> +	/* Called by security_inode_alloc(), it cannot be NULL. */
> +	iint->flags = 0UL;
> +	iint->evm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void evm_file_release(struct file *file)
> +{
> +	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> +	struct evm_iint_cache *iint = evm_iint_inode(inode);
> +	fmode_t mode = file->f_mode;
> +
> +	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || !(mode & FMODE_WRITE))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (iint && atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) == 1)
> +		iint->flags &= ~EVM_NEW_FILE;
> +}
> +
> +static void evm_post_path_mknod(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> +	struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
> +	struct evm_iint_cache *iint = evm_iint_inode(inode);
> +
> +	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (iint)
> +		iint->flags |= EVM_NEW_FILE;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_EVM_LOAD_X509
>  void __init evm_load_x509(void)
>  {
> @@ -1071,6 +1098,9 @@ static struct security_hook_list evm_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_removexattr, evm_inode_removexattr),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_post_removexattr, evm_inode_post_removexattr),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_init_security, evm_inode_init_security),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_alloc_security, evm_inode_alloc_security),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(file_release, evm_file_release),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(path_post_mknod, evm_post_path_mknod),
>  };
>  
>  static const struct lsm_id evm_lsmid = {
> @@ -1084,10 +1114,16 @@ static int __init init_evm_lsm(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +struct lsm_blob_sizes evm_blob_sizes __ro_after_init = {
> +	.lbs_inode = sizeof(struct evm_iint_cache),
> +	.lbs_xattr_count = 1,
> +};
> +
>  DEFINE_LSM(evm) = {
>  	.name = "evm",
>  	.init = init_evm_lsm,
>  	.order = LSM_ORDER_LAST,
> +	.blobs = &evm_blob_sizes,
>  };
>  
>  late_initcall(init_evm);
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> index 076451109637..1dd6ee72a20a 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
>  	}
>  
>  	status = evm_verifyxattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA, xattr_value,
> -				 rc < 0 ? 0 : rc, iint);
> +				 rc < 0 ? 0 : rc);
>  	switch (status) {
>  	case INTEGRITY_PASS:
>  	case INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE:
> diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h
> index 59eaddd84434..7a97c269a072 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/integrity.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@
>  #define IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED	0x01000000
>  #define IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO	0x02000000
>  #define IMA_NEW_FILE		0x04000000
> -#define EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG	0x08000000
>  #define IMA_FAIL_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGS	0x10000000
>  #define IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED	0x20000000
>  #define IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST	0x40000000
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index a44740640a9a..f811cc376a7a 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -1716,8 +1716,8 @@ int security_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	if (initxattrs) {
> -		/* Allocate +1 for EVM and +1 as terminator. */
> -		new_xattrs = kcalloc(blob_sizes.lbs_xattr_count + 2,
> +		/* Allocate +1 as terminator. */
> +		new_xattrs = kcalloc(blob_sizes.lbs_xattr_count + 1,
>  				     sizeof(*new_xattrs), GFP_NOFS);
>  		if (!new_xattrs)
>  			return -ENOMEM;

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-16 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-15 18:17 [PATCH v9 00/25] security: Move IMA and EVM to the LSM infrastructure Roberto Sassu
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 01/25] ima: Align ima_inode_post_setattr() definition with " Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` [PATCH v9 1/25] " Paul Moore
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 02/25] ima: Align ima_file_mprotect() " Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` [PATCH v9 2/25] " Paul Moore
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 03/25] ima: Align ima_inode_setxattr() " Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` [PATCH v9 3/25] " Paul Moore
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 04/25] ima: Align ima_inode_removexattr() " Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` [PATCH v9 4/25] " Paul Moore
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 05/25] ima: Align ima_post_read_file() " Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` [PATCH v9 5/25] " Paul Moore
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 06/25] evm: Align evm_inode_post_setattr() " Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` [PATCH v9 6/25] " Paul Moore
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 07/25] evm: Align evm_inode_setxattr() " Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` [PATCH v9 7/25] " Paul Moore
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 08/25] evm: Align evm_inode_post_setxattr() " Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` [PATCH v9 8/25] " Paul Moore
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 09/25] security: Align inode_setattr hook definition with EVM Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` [PATCH v9 9/25] " Paul Moore
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 10/25] security: Introduce inode_post_setattr hook Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-09 10:17   ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 11/25] security: Introduce inode_post_removexattr hook Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-09 10:17   ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 12/25] security: Introduce file_post_open hook Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-09  9:56   ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09  9:59     ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 10:12   ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 10:46     ` Roberto Sassu
2024-02-09 11:34       ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 12:02         ` Roberto Sassu
2024-02-12 21:00   ` Mimi Zohar
2024-02-12 21:16     ` Paul Moore
2024-02-13 12:58       ` Roberto Sassu
2024-02-13 15:33         ` Paul Moore
2024-02-14 20:07           ` Mimi Zohar
2024-02-14 21:21             ` Paul Moore
2024-02-15  8:16               ` Mimi Zohar
2024-02-15 15:02                 ` Paul Moore
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 13/25] security: Introduce file_release hook Roberto Sassu
2024-01-15 19:15   ` Al Viro
2024-01-16  8:47     ` Roberto Sassu
2024-01-16 16:51       ` Casey Schaufler
2024-01-16 17:33         ` Al Viro
2024-01-16 18:18           ` Casey Schaufler
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-09 10:15   ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-12 17:21   ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 14/25] security: Introduce path_post_mknod hook Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-09  9:54   ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-12 17:23   ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-15 18:17 ` [PATCH v9 15/25] security: Introduce inode_post_create_tmpfile hook Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-09  9:53   ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-12 17:26   ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-15 18:18 ` [PATCH v9 16/25] security: Introduce inode_post_set_acl hook Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-09  9:51   ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-15 18:18 ` [PATCH v9 17/25] security: Introduce inode_post_remove_acl hook Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-09  9:52   ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-15 18:18 ` [PATCH v9 18/25] security: Introduce key_post_create_or_update hook Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-01-15 18:18 ` [PATCH v9 19/25] integrity: Move integrity_kernel_module_request() to IMA Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-12 17:37   ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-12 17:56     ` Paul Moore
2024-02-12 20:28       ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-13  8:57         ` Roberto Sassu
2024-02-13 16:31           ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-15  9:29             ` Roberto Sassu
2024-01-15 18:18 ` [PATCH v9 20/25] ima: Move to LSM infrastructure Roberto Sassu
2024-01-16 18:57   ` Casey Schaufler
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-09  9:50   ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-12 17:45   ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-15 18:18 ` [PATCH v9 21/25] ima: Move IMA-Appraisal " Roberto Sassu
2024-01-16 19:03   ` Casey Schaufler
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-09  9:45   ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-15 18:18 ` [PATCH v9 22/25] evm: Move " Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-09  9:48   ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-12 18:26   ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-15 18:18 ` [PATCH v9 23/25] evm: Make it independent from 'integrity' LSM Roberto Sassu
2024-01-16 19:39   ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-12 19:13   ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-15 18:18 ` [PATCH v9 24/25] ima: " Roberto Sassu
2024-01-16 19:40   ` Casey Schaufler
2024-02-12 19:47   ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-15 18:18 ` [PATCH v9 25/25] integrity: Remove LSM Roberto Sassu
2024-01-16 19:41   ` Casey Schaufler
2024-02-08  3:18   ` Paul Moore
2024-02-12 19:50   ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-08  3:18 ` [PATCH v9 0/25] security: Move IMA and EVM to the LSM infrastructure Paul Moore
2024-02-08  8:05   ` Roberto Sassu
2024-02-08 14:16     ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0a5b99b9-0839-4f76-abb4-1fc9e5a6cb49@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kolga@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®