Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/reboot: Use the static sys-off handler for any priority

[Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>]

On 2/19/23 02:20, Samuel Holland wrote:
> On 2/14/23 18:17, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
...
>> Sorry for being slow here, I'd been assuming someone would Ack this but
>> it looks like maybe there's nobody in the maintainers file for
>> kernel/reboot.c?  I'm fine taking this via the RISC-V tree if that's OK
>> with people, but the cover letter suggests the patch is necessary for
>> multiple patch sets.
> 
> See also Dmitry's reply[0] to the PSCI thread. (Maybe I should have sent
> both conversions as one series?)
> 
> I am happy with the patches going through any tree. The kernel/reboot.c
> patch is exactly the same between the two series, so it should not hurt
> if it gets merged twice. Though if you take this series through the
> RISC-V tree, maybe you want to create a tag for it?
> 
> I am not sure exactly what needs to be done here; I am happy to do
> anything that would assist getting both series merged for v6.3, to avoid
> a regression with axp20x[1].
> 
> Regards,
> Samuel
> 
> [0]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0a180849-ba1b-2a82-ab06-ed1b8155d5ca@collabora.com/
> [1]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/e38d29f5-cd3c-4a2b-b355-2bcfad00a24b@sholland.org/

The reboot.c changes should be acked/applied by Rafael.
I noticed that you haven't CC'd the linux-pm ML, maybe that's why it
hasn't got the attention.

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry