Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.116.70.75]) by smtp.cwctv.net  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.447.44);
	 Tue, 31 Dec 2002 17:04:46 +0000
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S263760AbSLaQ5n>; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:57:43 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S263899AbSLaQ5n>; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:57:43 -0500
Received: from smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.1.34]:13816 "EHLO
	smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S263760AbSLaQ5m>; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:57:42 -0500
Received: from kepler (129-112.8-67.tampabay.rr.com [67.8.112.129])
	by smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id gBVH5c48004550;
	Tue, 31 Dec 2002 12:05:38 -0500 (EST)
From: "Scott Robert Ladd" <scott@coyotegulch.com>
To: "Paul Jakma" <paulj@alphyra.ie>,
	"Mark Rutherford" <mark@justirc.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 12:05:35 -0500
Message-ID: <FKEAJLBKJCGBDJJIPJLJAEPFDOAA.scott@coyotegulch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212311541160.12063-100000@dunlop.admin.ie.alphyra.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-Path: linux-kernel-owner+Hell.Surfers=40cwctv.net@vger.kernel.org

Paul Jakma wrote
> "what you get for christmas?"
>
> "a lump of coal"
>
> at least you get /something/. however, you didnt get what counts,
> programming info for the card.

I, and many other Linux users, do not consider nVidia's drivers to be "a
lump of coal." What "counts" is being able to use my hardware effectively.
Closed-source drivers may not be ideal, but few things in life are.

Even the conservative Debian distribution (which I use) has the nVidia
drivers available in the distribution.

In order of preference (for me):

1) High-quality drivers with open source
2) High-quality drivers with closed source
3) Poor-quality drivers with open source
4) Poor-quality drivers with closed source

Out of four possibilities, we're getting the next-to-best thing. Certainly,
I'd *like* to have the specs for nVidia's cards -- but given competition
between nVidia and ATI, I don't see that happening. One advantage nVidia has
(small as it may be) is high-quality drivers for Linux; it's one reason my
Linux systems have TNT2 and GeForce 4 cards installed.

Note that my Windows boxes run ATI cards; I'm not an nVidia shill.

One of Linux's historical weaknesses (when compared to the competition) is
video support. While I urge nVidia to open their specifications (and in the
end think it would be in their best interest), I'm also very pleased that
they provide high-performance drivers for free (as in beer).

...Scott

--
Scott Robert Ladd
Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com)
Professional programming for science and engineering;
Interesting and unusual bits of very free code.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/