mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com>,
	Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] genirq/msi: Move prepare() call to per-device allocation
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 16:22:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b1d7aec-1eac-a9cd-502a-339e216e08a1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513163144.2215824-4-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On 2025/5/14 0:31, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The current device MSI infrastructure is subtly broken, as it
> will issue an .msi_prepare() callback into the MSI controller
> driver every time it needs to allocate an MSI. That's pretty wrong,
> as the contract (or unwarranted assumption, depending who you ask)
> between the MSI controller and the core code is that .msi_prepare()
> is called exactly once per device.
> 
> This leads to some subtle breakage in said MSI controller drivers,
> as it gives the impression that there are multiple endpoints sharing
> a bus identifier (RID in PCI parlance, DID for GICv3+). It implies
> that whatever allocation the ITS driver (for example) has done on
> behalf of these devices cannot be undone, as there is no way to
> track the shared state. This is particularly bad for wire-MSI devices,
> for which .msi_prepare() is called for. each. input. line.
> 
> To address this issue, move the call to .msi_prepare() to take place
> at the point of irq domain allocation, which is the only place that
> makes sense. The msi_alloc_info_t structure is made part of the
> msi_domain_template, so that its life-cycle is that of the domain
> as well.
> 
> Finally, the msi_info::alloc_data field is made to point at this
> allocation tracking structure, ensuring that it is carried around
> the block.
> 
> This is all pretty straightforward, except for the non-device-MSI
> leftovers, which still have to call .msi_prepare() at the old
> spot. One day...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/msi.h |  2 ++
>  kernel/irq/msi.c    | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
> index 63c23003ec9b7..ba1c77a829a1c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/msi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/msi.h
> @@ -516,12 +516,14 @@ struct msi_domain_info {
>   * @chip:	Interrupt chip for this domain
>   * @ops:	MSI domain ops
>   * @info:	MSI domain info data
> + * @alloc_info:	MSI domain allocation data (arch specific)
>   */
>  struct msi_domain_template {
>  	char			name[48];
>  	struct irq_chip		chip;
>  	struct msi_domain_ops	ops;
>  	struct msi_domain_info	info;
> +	msi_alloc_info_t	alloc_info;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> index 31378a2535fb9..07eb857efd15e 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ struct msi_ctrl {
>  static void msi_domain_free_locked(struct device *dev, struct msi_ctrl *ctrl);
>  static unsigned int msi_domain_get_hwsize(struct device *dev, unsigned int domid);
>  static inline int msi_sysfs_create_group(struct device *dev);
> -
> +static int msi_domain_prepare_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> +				   int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *arg);
>  
>  /**
>   * msi_alloc_desc - Allocate an initialized msi_desc
> @@ -1023,6 +1024,7 @@ bool msi_create_device_irq_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int domid,
>  	bundle->info.ops = &bundle->ops;
>  	bundle->info.data = domain_data;
>  	bundle->info.chip_data = chip_data;
> +	bundle->info.alloc_data = &bundle->alloc_info;
>  
>  	pops = parent->msi_parent_ops;
>  	snprintf(bundle->name, sizeof(bundle->name), "%s%s-%s",
> @@ -1061,11 +1063,18 @@ bool msi_create_device_irq_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int domid,
>  	if (!domain)
>  		return false;
>  
> +	domain->dev = dev;
> +	dev->msi.data->__domains[domid].domain = domain;
> +
> +	if (msi_domain_prepare_irqs(domain, dev, hwsize, &bundle->alloc_info)) {

Does it work for MSI? hwsize is 1 in the MSI case, without taking
pci_msi_vec_count() into account.

bool pci_setup_msi_device_domain(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
	[...]

	return pci_create_device_domain(pdev, &pci_msi_template, 1);

Thanks,
Zenghui

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-03  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-13 16:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] genirq/msi: Fix device MSI prepare/alloc sequencing Marc Zyngier
2025-05-13 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] genirq/msi: Add .msi_teardown() callback as the reverse of .msi_prepare() Marc Zyngier
2025-05-16 10:02   ` [tip: irq/msi] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2025-05-13 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Implement .msi_teardown() callback Marc Zyngier
2025-05-16 10:02   ` [tip: irq/msi] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2025-05-13 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] genirq/msi: Move prepare() call to per-device allocation Marc Zyngier
2025-05-16 10:02   ` [tip: irq/msi] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2025-06-03  8:22   ` Zenghui Yu [this message]
2025-06-03  9:35     ` [PATCH v2 3/5] " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-06-03 13:09       ` Marc Zyngier
2025-06-03 14:37         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-06-04  1:52           ` Zenghui Yu
2025-06-03 12:50     ` Marc Zyngier
2025-06-03 13:07       ` Zenghui Yu
2025-06-03 13:27         ` Marc Zyngier
2025-06-03 13:29       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-06-03 14:03         ` Marc Zyngier
2025-06-03 14:08           ` Marc Zyngier
2025-05-13 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] genirq/msi: Engage the .msi_teardown() callback on domain removal Marc Zyngier
2025-05-16 10:02   ` [tip: irq/msi] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2025-05-13 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Use allocation size from the prepare call Marc Zyngier
2025-05-16 10:02   ` [tip: irq/msi] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2025-05-18 18:53   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] " Thomas Gleixner
2025-05-19 10:15     ` Marc Zyngier
2025-05-19 12:16       ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-05-19 14:28         ` Marc Zyngier
2025-05-21 15:29           ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0b1d7aec-1eac-a9cd-502a-339e216e08a1@huawei.com \
    --to=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=sascha.bischoff@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=timothy.hayes@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®