From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932333AbdJQODA (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:03:00 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:8484 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753971AbdJQOC7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:02:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: set right LR register value for 32 bit guest when inject abort To: Christoffer Dall CC: Marc Zyngier , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "christoffer.dall@linaro.org" , "rkrcmar@redhat.com" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <0184EA26B2509940AA629AE1405DD7F201699F61@DGGEMA503-MBX.china.huawei.com> <20171016195901.GA5753@lvm> From: gengdongjiu Message-ID: <0b35fe8c-59d9-96bd-2e61-66e7a2d463fc@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 22:00:59 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171016195901.GA5753@lvm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.142.68.147] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.59E60D77.01DB,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2014-11-16 11:51:01, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: cd4ac041633521e15c56cf1abf9eef4d Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Christoffer On 2017/10/17 3:59, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 04:10:01PM +0000, gengdongjiu wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >>> >>> Please also update the 32bit code accordingly, as it looks broken too. >> >> I have updated the 32 bit code according, in my hand, there is no arm32 host environment, >> So there is no method to verify it in the arm32 host, only verify the patch in the arm64 host. >> >> Anyway I firstly send the patch out for review. Thanks. >> > In this case, if you just clearly specify in the patches you send out > that the 32-bit one is untested, you can ask someone to test it for you. > Thanks for your reminder, today I found a arm32 board and have tested it. So I have tested in both arm32 and arm64. please review it. thanks. > Thanks, > -Christoffer > > . >