mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] pps: pps-gpio: split IRQ handler into hardirq timestamper + threaded handler
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2026 07:50:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b4b22bb-1f17-4e13-aa17-ea13476541c9@enneenne.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F4693DE2-E36F-4157-BB7B-A98A7C1C76E3@by-online.de>

Hi Andrew,

Could you please pick this patch up for the 7.3 merge window via the -mm tree?

Since the PPS subsystem doesn't have its own dedicated git tree, routing it 
through -mm is the standard path. The patch already has my Acked-by, along with 
all the necessary reviews and test tags.

Thanks,
Rodolfo

On 03/07/2026 20:20, Michael Byczkowski wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Now that 7.2-rc1 is out and this didn't make the merge window, could someone please confirm which tree will carry this for 7.3?
> So far, the patch has been:
>      • Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (Jun 2)
>      • Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti (PPS maintainer, from earlier revisions)
>      • Tested-by from Calvin Owens and myself
> 
> I'm not sure whether it should go via drivers/pps (Rodolfo), the rt tree, or -mm. Happy to help route it wherever makes sense.
> lore: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/79BC1B96-FD2C-4191-8766-6C46BF8A1089@by-online.de/
> 
> Thank you very much and best regards,
> Michael
> 
> 
> 
>> On 3. Jun 2026, at 19:29, Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Sebastian, and thank you Calvin for relaying. I appreciate the
>> thorough review that got this to the right shape.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Michael
>>
>>
>>> On 2. Jun 2026, at 08:36, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2026-06-01 17:44:09 [-0700], Calvin Owens wrote:
>>>> From: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
>>>>
>>>> Split the pps-gpio interrupt handler into a primary (hardirq) handler
>>>> that captures the PPS timestamp at interrupt entry, and a threaded
>>>> handler that processes the event. This produces the same two-part
>>>> handler structure on both PREEMPT_RT and non-RT kernels.
>>>>
>>>> On non-RT kernels the threaded portion runs immediately after the
>>>> primary, with no behavioral change compared to the previous
>>>> single-handler implementation.
>>>>
>>>> On PREEMPT_RT, where interrupt handlers are force-threaded by default,
>>>> the previous single-handler implementation captured the timestamp
>>>> inside the threaded portion, after IRQ-thread scheduling delay. With
>>>> the split, the timestamp is captured in true hardirq context as it is
>>>> on non-RT kernels, eliminating a significant source of PPS jitter on
>>>> RT systems.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
>>>> Tested-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>
>>>> Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
>>>
>>> Sebastian
>>
> 


-- 
GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver                          giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems                     phone:  +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-04  5:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-02  0:44 [PATCH v7 0/1] pps: improve PREEMPT_RT performance Calvin Owens
2026-06-02  0:44 ` [PATCH v7 1/1] pps: pps-gpio: split IRQ handler into hardirq timestamper + threaded handler Calvin Owens
2026-06-02  6:36   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 17:29     ` Michael Byczkowski
2026-07-03 18:20       ` Michael Byczkowski
2026-07-04  5:50         ` Rodolfo Giometti [this message]
2026-07-05  1:06   ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-05  1:35     ` Calvin Owens
2026-07-05 20:18       ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-06 17:19         ` [PATCH v2 next] pps-gpio: Remove dead capture_clear code Calvin Owens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0b4b22bb-1f17-4e13-aa17-ea13476541c9@enneenne.com \
    --to=giometti@enneenne.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=by@by-online.de \
    --cc=calvin@wbinvd.org \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=farbere@amazon.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome