Re: (subset) [PATCH v7 00/20] Samsung S2MPG10 regulator and S2MPG11 PMIC drivers

["André Draszik" <andre.draszik@linaro.org>]

Hi Lee,

On Thu, 2026-01-22 at 16:35 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:43:27 +0000, André Draszik wrote:
> > This series extends the existing S2MPG10 PMIC driver to add support for
> > the regulators, and adds new S2MPG11 core and regulator drivers.
> > 
> > --- dependency note ---
> > This series must be applied in-order, due to the regulator drivers
> > depending on headers & definitions added by the bindings and core
> > drivers.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [04/20] dt-bindings: mfd: samsung,s2mps11: Split s2mpg10-pmic into separate file
>         commit: c19ccbf37758f90064f7b1e32ec291954d97b426
> [05/20] dt-bindings: mfd: samsung,s2mpg10-pmic: Link to its regulators
>         commit: ac1068790221a421e7bc4dacadfe8d39d6bec3a9
> [06/20] dt-bindings: mfd: Add samsung,s2mpg11-pmic
>         commit: d0cd9ded4bdef73303e65abbeae47b00b7288059

Thanks for queuing these, but FYI, I think leaving out patches 1 to 3 will
give validation errors.

As mentioned in cover letter, the patches must be applied in order, for
bindings particularly the mfd-binding patches depend on the regulator-
binding updates, specifically patches 4 and 5 reference files added in
patches 2 and 3 respectively.

Also, without patch 1, I'd say there will be validation errors from the
example DTS that patch 1 updates in preparation for patch 4.

Maybe that's all OK while things are being merged via different trees, but
I just wanted to point it out.

Cheers,
Andre'