To Lee, Pavel: Re: [PATCH v25 0/4] rust: leds: add led classdev abstractions

[Markus Probst <markus.probst@posteo.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1490 bytes --]

@Lee, @Pavel:

Hi,

This message has already been posted once [1] and no reply has been
sent. So I added your names to the subject line, so this message will
hopefully make a difference.

--- The contents of the original message:

Regarding the leds rust abstraction patch series.

Lee already mentioned he will take Rust patches into his tree if
"quality Rust-specific Reviewed-by" trailers are present [2].
Will this also apply for any subsequent patches (e.g. bug fixes)?

Secondly, there hasn't been a comment on me taking the maintainer role
for the Rust abstraction yet. If thats fine with you, I kindly ask you
to ACK the patch adding the MAINTAINERS file entry [3].

I was told there have been cases in the past of maintainers leaving the
kernel directly after code has been merged. To take away any fears that
might exist, I can assure you I will take care of the Rust code.

If there is a patch with breaking API changes on the C side, simply add
me to Cc and I will fix the Rust side.

The missing ACK on the patch adding the MAINTAINERS file entry [3] and
the missing Reviewed-By Rust trailers should be the only blockers of
this patch series.

Thanks
- Markus Probst

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/6c57e08a5f4aa9096711d14d82ece19fb68c893f.camel@posteo.de/

[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20251110134058.GC1949330@google.com/

[3]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20260903-rust_leds-v24-4-8d9e4c04db69@posteo.de/

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 870 bytes --]