From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop memory device reference after find_memory_block()
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:11:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bbe632f-cb85-4a98-0c79-ded11cf39081@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190411084141.GQ10383@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 11.04.19 10:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 10-04-19 12:14:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> While current node handling is probably terribly broken for memory block
>> devices that span several nodes (only possible when added during boot,
>> and something like that should be blocked completely), properly put the
>> device reference we obtained via find_memory_block() to get the nid.
>
> The changelog could see some improvements I believe. (Half) stating
> broken status of multinode memblock is not really useful without a wider
> context so I would simply remove it. More to the point, it would be much
> better to actually describe the actual problem and the user visible
> effect.
>
> "
> d0dc12e86b31 ("mm/memory_hotplug: optimize memory hotplug") has started
> using find_memory_block to get a nodeid for the beginnig of the onlined
> pfn range. The commit has missed that the memblock contains a reference
> counted object and a missing put_device will leak the kobject behind
> which ADD THE USER VISIBLE EFFECT HERE.
> "
I don't think mentioning the commit a second time is really needed.
"
Right now we are using find_memory_block() to get the node id for the
pfn range to online. We are missing to drop a reference to the memory
block device. While the device still gets unregistered via
device_unregister(), resulting in no user visible problem, the device is
never released via device_release(), resulting in a memory leak. Fix
that by properly using a put_device().
"
>
>> Fixes: d0dc12e86b31 ("mm/memory_hotplug: optimize memory hotplug")
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
>> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
>> Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>
>> Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
> Other than that
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
>> ---
>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> index 5eb4a4c7c21b..328878b6799d 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> @@ -854,6 +854,7 @@ int __ref online_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, int online_typ
>> */
>> mem = find_memory_block(__pfn_to_section(pfn));
>> nid = mem->nid;
>> + put_device(&mem->dev);
>>
>> /* associate pfn range with the zone */
>> zone = move_pfn_range(online_type, nid, pfn, nr_pages);
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-11 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 10:14 David Hildenbrand
2019-04-10 12:28 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-10 12:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-10 22:24 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-11 8:41 ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-11 9:11 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-04-11 10:56 ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-11 11:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-11 11:32 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0bbe632f-cb85-4a98-0c79-ded11cf39081@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arunks@codeaurora.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=malat@debian.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®