From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com, "David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@amd.com, "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kai-Heng Feng" <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
zhuning@everest-semi.com,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 1/3] drm/amdgpu: fix checkpatch warnings
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 13:21:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bbf075f-ebd7-321f-4692-5bb5da0d638d@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220704135421.1215140-1-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
Am 04.07.22 um 15:54 schrieb Vijendar Mukunda:
> From: vijendar <vijendar.mukunda@amd.com>
>
> Fixed below checkpatch warnings and errors
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:131: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "apd"
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:150: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "apd"
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:196: CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u64' over 'uint64_t'
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:224: CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:226: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!adev->acp.acp_genpd"
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:233: CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:239: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:241: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!adev->acp.acp_cell"
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:247: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!adev->acp.acp_res"
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:253: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!i2s_pdata"
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:350: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:550: ERROR: that open brace { should be on the previous line
>
> Signed-off-by: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>
> changes since v1:
> Modified commit label as drm/amdgpu
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c | 27 +++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> index cc9c9f8b23b2..ba1605ff521f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int acp_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> struct amdgpu_device *adev;
>
> apd = container_of(genpd, struct acp_pm_domain, gpd);
> - if (apd != NULL) {
> + if (apd) {
Well that's still not correct. The variable apd is compute by an upcast
of the genpd parameter.
Since that upcast never returns a NULL value (gpd is not the first
member of the structure) this whole check is completely nonsense.
I strongly suggest to just remove most of those NULL checks.
Only the ones directly after memory allocation really make sense.
Regards,
Christian.
> adev = apd->adev;
> /* call smu to POWER GATE ACP block
> * smu will
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int acp_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> struct amdgpu_device *adev;
>
> apd = container_of(genpd, struct acp_pm_domain, gpd);
> - if (apd != NULL) {
> + if (apd) {
> adev = apd->adev;
> /* call smu to UNGATE ACP block
> * smu will
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int acp_genpd_remove_device(struct device *dev, void *data)
> static int acp_hw_init(void *handle)
> {
> int r;
> - uint64_t acp_base;
> + u64 acp_base;
> u32 val = 0;
> u32 count = 0;
> struct i2s_platform_data *i2s_pdata = NULL;
> @@ -220,37 +220,32 @@ static int acp_hw_init(void *handle)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> acp_base = adev->rmmio_base;
> -
> -
> adev->acp.acp_genpd = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acp_pm_domain), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (adev->acp.acp_genpd == NULL)
> + if (!adev->acp.acp_genpd)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> adev->acp.acp_genpd->gpd.name = "ACP_AUDIO";
> adev->acp.acp_genpd->gpd.power_off = acp_poweroff;
> adev->acp.acp_genpd->gpd.power_on = acp_poweron;
> -
> -
> adev->acp.acp_genpd->adev = adev;
>
> pm_genpd_init(&adev->acp.acp_genpd->gpd, NULL, false);
>
> - adev->acp.acp_cell = kcalloc(ACP_DEVS, sizeof(struct mfd_cell),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + adev->acp.acp_cell = kcalloc(ACP_DEVS, sizeof(struct mfd_cell), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> - if (adev->acp.acp_cell == NULL) {
> + if (!adev->acp.acp_cell) {
> r = -ENOMEM;
> goto failure;
> }
>
> adev->acp.acp_res = kcalloc(5, sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (adev->acp.acp_res == NULL) {
> + if (!adev->acp.acp_res) {
> r = -ENOMEM;
> goto failure;
> }
>
> i2s_pdata = kcalloc(3, sizeof(struct i2s_platform_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (i2s_pdata == NULL) {
> + if (!i2s_pdata) {
> r = -ENOMEM;
> goto failure;
> }
> @@ -346,8 +341,7 @@ static int acp_hw_init(void *handle)
> adev->acp.acp_cell[3].platform_data = &i2s_pdata[2];
> adev->acp.acp_cell[3].pdata_size = sizeof(struct i2s_platform_data);
>
> - r = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(adev->acp.parent, adev->acp.acp_cell,
> - ACP_DEVS);
> + r = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(adev->acp.parent, adev->acp.acp_cell, ACP_DEVS);
> if (r)
> goto failure;
>
> @@ -546,8 +540,7 @@ static const struct amd_ip_funcs acp_ip_funcs = {
> .set_powergating_state = acp_set_powergating_state,
> };
>
> -const struct amdgpu_ip_block_version acp_ip_block =
> -{
> +const struct amdgpu_ip_block_version acp_ip_block = {
> .type = AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_ACP,
> .major = 2,
> .minor = 2,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-05 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-04 13:54 Vijendar Mukunda
2022-07-04 13:54 ` [PATCH RESEND V2 2/3] drm/amdgpu: add dmi check for jadeite platform Vijendar Mukunda
2022-07-04 13:54 ` [PATCH RESEND V2 3/3] drm/amdgpu: create I2S platform devices for Jadeite platform Vijendar Mukunda
2022-07-05 11:21 ` Christian König [this message]
2022-07-05 15:32 ` [PATCH RESEND V2 1/3] drm/amdgpu: fix checkpatch warnings Mukunda,Vijendar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0bbf075f-ebd7-321f-4692-5bb5da0d638d@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@amd.com \
--cc=Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com \
--cc=Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhuning@everest-semi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®