mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com, "David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@amd.com, "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kai-Heng Feng" <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	zhuning@everest-semi.com,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 1/3] drm/amdgpu: fix checkpatch warnings
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 13:21:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bbf075f-ebd7-321f-4692-5bb5da0d638d@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220704135421.1215140-1-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>



Am 04.07.22 um 15:54 schrieb Vijendar Mukunda:
> From: vijendar <vijendar.mukunda@amd.com>
>
> Fixed below checkpatch warnings and errors
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:131: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "apd"
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:150: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "apd"
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:196: CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u64' over 'uint64_t'
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:224: CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:226: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!adev->acp.acp_genpd"
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:233: CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:239: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:241: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!adev->acp.acp_cell"
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:247: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!adev->acp.acp_res"
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:253: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!i2s_pdata"
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:350: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c:550: ERROR: that open brace { should be on the previous line
>
> Signed-off-by: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>
> changes since v1:
>      Modified commit label as drm/amdgpu
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c | 27 +++++++++----------------
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> index cc9c9f8b23b2..ba1605ff521f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int acp_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>   	struct amdgpu_device *adev;
>   
>   	apd = container_of(genpd, struct acp_pm_domain, gpd);
> -	if (apd != NULL) {
> +	if (apd) {

Well that's still not correct. The variable apd is compute by an upcast 
of the genpd parameter.

Since that upcast never returns a NULL value (gpd is not the first 
member of the structure) this whole check is completely nonsense.

I strongly suggest to just remove most of those NULL checks.

Only the ones directly after memory allocation really make sense.

Regards,
Christian.

>   		adev = apd->adev;
>   	/* call smu to POWER GATE ACP block
>   	 * smu will
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int acp_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>   	struct amdgpu_device *adev;
>   
>   	apd = container_of(genpd, struct acp_pm_domain, gpd);
> -	if (apd != NULL) {
> +	if (apd) {
>   		adev = apd->adev;
>   	/* call smu to UNGATE ACP block
>   	 * smu will
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int acp_genpd_remove_device(struct device *dev, void *data)
>   static int acp_hw_init(void *handle)
>   {
>   	int r;
> -	uint64_t acp_base;
> +	u64 acp_base;
>   	u32 val = 0;
>   	u32 count = 0;
>   	struct i2s_platform_data *i2s_pdata = NULL;
> @@ -220,37 +220,32 @@ static int acp_hw_init(void *handle)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
>   	acp_base = adev->rmmio_base;
> -
> -
>   	adev->acp.acp_genpd = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acp_pm_domain), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (adev->acp.acp_genpd == NULL)
> +	if (!adev->acp.acp_genpd)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
>   	adev->acp.acp_genpd->gpd.name = "ACP_AUDIO";
>   	adev->acp.acp_genpd->gpd.power_off = acp_poweroff;
>   	adev->acp.acp_genpd->gpd.power_on = acp_poweron;
> -
> -
>   	adev->acp.acp_genpd->adev = adev;
>   
>   	pm_genpd_init(&adev->acp.acp_genpd->gpd, NULL, false);
>   
> -	adev->acp.acp_cell = kcalloc(ACP_DEVS, sizeof(struct mfd_cell),
> -							GFP_KERNEL);
> +	adev->acp.acp_cell = kcalloc(ACP_DEVS, sizeof(struct mfd_cell), GFP_KERNEL);
>   
> -	if (adev->acp.acp_cell == NULL) {
> +	if (!adev->acp.acp_cell) {
>   		r = -ENOMEM;
>   		goto failure;
>   	}
>   
>   	adev->acp.acp_res = kcalloc(5, sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (adev->acp.acp_res == NULL) {
> +	if (!adev->acp.acp_res) {
>   		r = -ENOMEM;
>   		goto failure;
>   	}
>   
>   	i2s_pdata = kcalloc(3, sizeof(struct i2s_platform_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (i2s_pdata == NULL) {
> +	if (!i2s_pdata) {
>   		r = -ENOMEM;
>   		goto failure;
>   	}
> @@ -346,8 +341,7 @@ static int acp_hw_init(void *handle)
>   	adev->acp.acp_cell[3].platform_data = &i2s_pdata[2];
>   	adev->acp.acp_cell[3].pdata_size = sizeof(struct i2s_platform_data);
>   
> -	r = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(adev->acp.parent, adev->acp.acp_cell,
> -								ACP_DEVS);
> +	r = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(adev->acp.parent, adev->acp.acp_cell, ACP_DEVS);
>   	if (r)
>   		goto failure;
>   
> @@ -546,8 +540,7 @@ static const struct amd_ip_funcs acp_ip_funcs = {
>   	.set_powergating_state = acp_set_powergating_state,
>   };
>   
> -const struct amdgpu_ip_block_version acp_ip_block =
> -{
> +const struct amdgpu_ip_block_version acp_ip_block = {
>   	.type = AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_ACP,
>   	.major = 2,
>   	.minor = 2,


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-05 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-04 13:54 Vijendar Mukunda
2022-07-04 13:54 ` [PATCH RESEND V2 2/3] drm/amdgpu: add dmi check for jadeite platform Vijendar Mukunda
2022-07-04 13:54 ` [PATCH RESEND V2 3/3] drm/amdgpu: create I2S platform devices for Jadeite platform Vijendar Mukunda
2022-07-05 11:21 ` Christian König [this message]
2022-07-05 15:32   ` [PATCH RESEND V2 1/3] drm/amdgpu: fix checkpatch warnings Mukunda,Vijendar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0bbf075f-ebd7-321f-4692-5bb5da0d638d@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@amd.com \
    --cc=Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com \
    --cc=Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com \
    --cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhuning@everest-semi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®