From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Javen <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>,
"hkallweit1@gmail.com" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"nic_swsd@realtek.com" <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
"andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/5] net: phy: realtek: add support for dummy phy
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 10:52:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bc2ae0e-316c-447e-9098-f18f4b491328@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f614a60942e34bf39b1d49fb273221ab@realsil.com.cn>
Hi,
On 6/3/26 10:00, Javen wrote:
>> On 6/3/26 08:59, javen wrote:
>>> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>>>
>>> Add support for rtl8116af dummy phy driver, match phy id and read link
>>> speed from MII_BMCR.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>>
>> Can you elaborate more on why this is needed ?
>>
>> The cover says :
>> "
>> In this mode, the driver
>> needs a dummy PHY ID so that phylib can attach to a dummy Realtek PHY
>> driver, while selected standard PHY registers are handled through the SerDes
>> register.
>> "
>>
>> Why can't you use the SerDes registers for your PHY driver ? The phrase above
>> suggests that the "SerDes registers" have the typical C22/45 layout. There are
>> PHYs and PCSs out there that aren't accessed through regular MDIO with
>> regmap being used to translate the mdio accesses done by phylib into the
>> actual register access method used.
>>
>> Maxime
>>
>
> Thanks for your review.
> Maybe I shouldn't call it a "dummy" PHY. It is actually a real, dedicated PHY driver for the RTL8116af operating in Fiber/SerDes mode. The reason we cannot use the standard generic PHY driver is that hardware does not correctly populate the standard Gigabit Status Register (MII_STAT1000, Reg 0x0a).
> Here is a snippet of our MDIO read trace during link up:
> r8169 0000:85:00.1: MDIO read: tp->ocp_base=0xa400, reg=0x0a, value=0x0000
> r8169 0000:85:00.1: MDIO read: tp->ocp_base=0xa400, reg=0x05, value=0x41a0
> Reg 0x0a returns 0x0000, the phylib generic status parser fails to resolve the 1000Mbps link, causing the driver to incorrectly fall back to a forced 10Mbps, even though the physical link is actually UP at 1000Mbps. Therefore, we need to register a custom PHY driver to provide a specific .read_status callback that parses MII_BMCR instead of relying on MII_STAT1000.
This behaviour of not getting proper information through the standard
register happens on multiple different PHYs, so having a dedicated driver
is the way to go indeed.
What does this PHY do exactly, does it connect to an SFP cage as the name
seems to imply ? If so, what kind of mode can it support ? 1000BaseX/100BaseX,
maybe SGMII as well ?
What I don't quite understand then is why you have the need to return a
custom PHY ID that matches that "dummy" driver, in the next patch.
If this is a regular PHY with C22 registers, what's the original content of
PHYSID1/2 ? M
Can you explain what the hardware looks like exactly ? What are the different
components involved, etc ?
Maxime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 6:59 [PATCH net-next v1 0/5] r8169: fix RTL8116AF low power and link readiness issues javen
2026-06-03 6:59 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/5] net: phy: realtek: add support for dummy phy javen
2026-06-03 7:38 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-06-03 8:00 ` Javen
2026-06-03 8:52 ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
2026-06-03 9:13 ` Javen
2026-06-03 9:48 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-06-03 10:03 ` Javen
2026-06-03 13:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-05 9:43 ` Javen
2026-06-05 10:50 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-06-03 6:59 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/5] r8169: move funcitons forward javen
2026-06-03 6:59 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/5] r8169: fix RTL8116af link readiness bug javen
2026-06-03 6:59 ` [PATCH net-next v1 4/5] r8169: add ltr support for RTL8116af javen
2026-06-03 6:59 ` [PATCH net-next v1 5/5] r8169: fix RTL8116af can not enter s0idle and c10 javen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0bc2ae0e-316c-447e-9098-f18f4b491328@bootlin.com \
--to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=javen_xu@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®