mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	corbet@lwn.net, workflows@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	security@kernel.org, linux@leemhuis.info,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: Document the Linux Kernel CVE process
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 16:03:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bd8c620-7f80-44c4-ade3-b3d7951b48d8@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024021500-laziness-grimace-ed80@gregkh>

On 15.02.24 13:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> The Linux kernel project now has the ability to assign CVEs to fixed
> issues, so document the process and how individual developers can get a
> CVE if one is not automatically assigned for their fixes.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
> ---
> v4: Add MAINTAINER entry
>      Lots of tiny wording changes based on many reviews
>      Collected some Reviewed-by: tags
>      Fixed documenation build by properly referencing the security
>      process documentation file.
> v3: fix up wording in security-bugs.rst based on the changes to the cve
>      assignment process from v1, thanks to a private reviewer for
>      pointing that out.
> v2: Grammer fixes based on review from Randy
>      Updated paragraph about how CVE identifiers will be assigned
>      (automatically when added to stable trees, or ask us for one
>      directly before that happens if so desired)
> 
>   Documentation/process/cve.rst           | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   Documentation/process/index.rst         |   1 +
>   Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst |   5 +-
>   MAINTAINERS                             |   5 +
>   4 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/process/cve.rst
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/cve.rst b/Documentation/process/cve.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6b244d938694
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/process/cve.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@

...

> +Invalid CVEs
> +------------
> +
> +If a security issue is found in a Linux kernel that is only supported by
> +a Linux distribution due to the changes that have been made by that
> +distribution, or due to the distribution supporting a kernel version
> +that is no longer one of the kernel.org supported releases, then a CVE
> +can not be assigned by the Linux kernel CVE team, and must be asked for
> +from that Linux distribution itself.
> +
> +Any CVE that is assigned against the Linux kernel for an actively
> +supported kernel version, by any group other than the kernel assignment
> +CVE team should not be treated as a valid CVE.  Please notify the
> +kernel CVE assignment team at <cve@kernel.org> so that they can work to
> +invalidate such entries through the CNA remediation process.

Today we (the Xen security team) are allocating CVEs for Xen-related
kernel security bugs.

Does this mean we should do that via cve@kernel.org in future, or are
you happy us continuing our process as today? If the latter, I think
this should be noted somehow in this document in order to avoid complaints
regarding CVEs allocated by us.


Juergen (on behalf of the Xen security team)

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-15 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-15 12:10 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-15 15:03 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
2024-02-15 17:49   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-16  8:04     ` Jürgen Groß
2024-02-15 17:38 ` Jiri Kosina
2024-02-15 18:24   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-16 19:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-02-16 20:27   ` Jiri Kosina
2024-02-16 21:45     ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-02-16 21:51       ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0bd8c620-7f80-44c4-ade3-b3d7951b48d8@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®