From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/selftests/pkeys: fork() to check for state being preserved
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 10:57:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c10a3c9-67a7-c404-da0f-d9df079fdd23@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190103135225.4929F217D9@mail.kernel.org>
On 1/3/19 5:52 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
> The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.0, v4.19.13, v4.14.91, v4.9.148, v4.4.169, v3.18.131,
>
> v4.20.0: Build OK!
> v4.19.13: Build OK!
> v4.14.91: Build OK!
> v4.9.148: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> f50b4878329a ("x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one")
Protection keys was merged in 4.8. We can ignore any of the selftests
changes before that.
But, it looks like the 4.9 selftests are a bit behind mainline.
Probably because I didn't cc stable@ on f50b4878329a. I don't have a
strong opinion as to how up-to-date we want to keep the -stable
selftests. Shua, is there a usual way that folks do this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-03 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-02 21:56 [PATCH 0/2] x86/mm/pkeys: fix user-visible pkey state destruction at fork() Dave Hansen
2019-01-02 21:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/pkeys: properly copy pkey state " Dave Hansen
[not found] ` <20190103135224.1BC7A21479@mail.kernel.org>
2019-01-03 18:54 ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-15 9:36 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys: Properly " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2019-01-02 21:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/selftests/pkeys: fork() to check for state being preserved Dave Hansen
[not found] ` <20190103135225.4929F217D9@mail.kernel.org>
2019-01-03 18:57 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2019-01-10 19:16 ` Greg KH
2019-01-15 9:37 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/selftests/pkeys: Fork() " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-26 19:51 [PATCH 1/2] x86/pkeys: copy pkey state at fork() Dave Hansen
2018-10-26 19:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/selftests/pkeys: fork() to check for state being preserved Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c10a3c9-67a7-c404-da0f-d9df079fdd23@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome