From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
Vikram Prakash <vikram.prakash@broadcom.com>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: host: iproc: Add ACPI support to IPROC SDHCI
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:10:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c1215a2-b8b3-e315-71e1-04501d02ba42@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABe79T5o431_XkKzh=zEfoPzs6pfMHrrTZGPW7218tekLkk=vw@mail.gmail.com>
On 30/07/18 09:02, Srinath Mannam wrote:
> Hi Adrian Hunter,
>
> Auto build error came to this patch, because it is depend on the
> patch "mmc: sdhci-pltfm: Convert DT properties to generic device properties"
> you have given to me.
>
> Can I send my patch along with your patch in a single patch series?
Yes, that is normally how it is done.
> Please advice.
>
> Regards,
> Srinath.
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 11:02 PM, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi Srinath,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on ulf.hansson-mmc/next]
>> [also build test ERROR on v4.18-rc6 next-20180727]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>>
>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Srinath-Mannam/mmc-host-iproc-Add-ACPI-support-to-IPROC-SDHCI/20180729-003026
>> base: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ulfh/mmc.git next
>> config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
>> compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.1.0
>> reproduce:
>> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> GCC_VERSION=8.1.0 make.cross ARCH=ia64
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c: In function 'sdhci_iproc_probe':
>>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c:304:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'sdhci_get_property'; did you mean 'sdhci_get_of_property'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> sdhci_get_property(pdev);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> sdhci_get_of_property
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>
>> vim +304 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c
>>
>> 276
>> 277 static int sdhci_iproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> 278 {
>> 279 struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> 280 const struct sdhci_iproc_data *iproc_data = NULL;
>> 281 struct sdhci_host *host;
>> 282 struct sdhci_iproc_host *iproc_host;
>> 283 struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host;
>> 284 int ret;
>> 285
>> 286 if (dev->of_node)
>> 287 iproc_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>> 288 else if (has_acpi_companion(dev))
>> 289 iproc_data = acpi_device_get_match_data(dev);
>> 290
>> 291 if (!iproc_data)
>> 292 return -ENODEV;
>> 293
>> 294 host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, iproc_data->pdata, sizeof(*iproc_host));
>> 295 if (IS_ERR(host))
>> 296 return PTR_ERR(host);
>> 297
>> 298 pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> 299 iproc_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>> 300
>> 301 iproc_host->data = iproc_data;
>> 302
>> 303 mmc_of_parse(host->mmc);
>> > 304 sdhci_get_property(pdev);
>> 305
>> 306 host->mmc->caps |= iproc_host->data->mmc_caps;
>> 307
>> 308 if (dev->of_node) {
>> 309 pltfm_host->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
>> 310 if (IS_ERR(pltfm_host->clk)) {
>> 311 ret = PTR_ERR(pltfm_host->clk);
>> 312 goto err;
>> 313 }
>> 314 ret = clk_prepare_enable(pltfm_host->clk);
>> 315 if (ret) {
>> 316 dev_err(dev, "failed to enable host clk\n");
>> 317 goto err;
>> 318 }
>> 319 }
>> 320
>> 321 if (iproc_host->data->pdata->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_MISSING_CAPS) {
>> 322 host->caps = iproc_host->data->caps;
>> 323 host->caps1 = iproc_host->data->caps1;
>> 324 }
>> 325
>> 326 ret = sdhci_add_host(host);
>> 327 if (ret)
>> 328 goto err_clk;
>> 329
>> 330 return 0;
>> 331
>> 332 err_clk:
>> 333 if (dev->of_node)
>> 334 clk_disable_unprepare(pltfm_host->clk);
>> 335 err:
>> 336 sdhci_pltfm_free(pdev);
>> 337 return ret;
>> 338 }
>> 339
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
>> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-30 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-28 16:15 Srinath Mannam
[not found] ` <201807290127.DcHKtABy%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
2018-07-30 6:02 ` Srinath Mannam
2018-07-30 6:10 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2018-07-30 6:13 ` Srinath Mannam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c1215a2-b8b3-e315-71e1-04501d02ba42@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=srinath.mannam@broadcom.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vikram.prakash@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®