From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D1FC4332F for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 11:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235885AbiC2Ldw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:33:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57226 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233980AbiC2Ldu (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:33:50 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A30F1B3706 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 04:32:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KSS6W4PYqzfZLD; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:30:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) by dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:32:05 +0800 Received: from [10.174.177.243] (10.174.177.243) by dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:32:04 +0800 Message-ID: <0c6e13cc-f768-2cb4-0aa3-cd090b99fc8f@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:32:04 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Revert "powerpc: Set max_mapnr correctly" Content-Language: en-US To: Christophe Leroy , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "mpe@ellerman.id.au" , "benh@kernel.crashing.or" , "paulus@samba.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" CC: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "npiggin@gmail.com" , "songyuanzheng@huawei.com" References: <20220216121109.157605-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> From: Kefeng Wang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.243] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggeme701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.97) To dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022/3/28 22:12, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Hi, > > Le 26/03/2022 à 08:55, Kefeng Wang a écrit : >> Hi maintainers， >> >> I saw the patches has been reviewed[1], could they be merged? > Thinking about it once more, I think the patches should go in reverse > order. Patch 2 should go first and patch 1 should go after. > > Otherwise, once patch 1 is applied and patch 2 is not applied yet, > virt_addr_valid() doesn't work anymore. Should I resend them or could the maintainer reverse order when merging them? > > Christophe > >> Many thanks. >> >> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=286464 >>