From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756547AbbAHKyo (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2015 05:54:44 -0500 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([199.115.105.18]:52588 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932199AbbAHKxt (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2015 05:53:49 -0500 From: Vladimir Davydov To: Andrew Morton CC: Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Greg Thelen , Glauber Costa , Dave Chinner , Alexander Viro , , Subject: [PATCH -mm v3 6/9] list_lru: get rid of ->active_nodes Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:53:16 +0300 Message-ID: <0c83534ab1cc4e16f66f8147c96579adad3ab39b.1420711973.git.vdavydov@parallels.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.10.4 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [81.5.99.36] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The active_nodes mask allows us to skip empty nodes when walking over list_lru items from all nodes in list_lru_count/walk. However, these functions are never called from hot paths, so it doesn't seem we need such kind of optimization there. OTOH, removing the mask will make it easier to make list_lru per-memcg. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov --- include/linux/list_lru.h | 5 ++--- mm/list_lru.c | 10 +++------- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/list_lru.h b/include/linux/list_lru.h index f500a2e39b13..53c1d6b78270 100644 --- a/include/linux/list_lru.h +++ b/include/linux/list_lru.h @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ struct list_lru_node { struct list_lru { struct list_lru_node *node; - nodemask_t active_nodes; }; void list_lru_destroy(struct list_lru *lru); @@ -94,7 +93,7 @@ static inline unsigned long list_lru_count(struct list_lru *lru) long count = 0; int nid; - for_each_node_mask(nid, lru->active_nodes) + for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) count += list_lru_count_node(lru, nid); return count; @@ -142,7 +141,7 @@ list_lru_walk(struct list_lru *lru, list_lru_walk_cb isolate, long isolated = 0; int nid; - for_each_node_mask(nid, lru->active_nodes) { + for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) { isolated += list_lru_walk_node(lru, nid, isolate, cb_arg, &nr_to_walk); if (nr_to_walk <= 0) diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c index f1a0db194173..07e198c77888 100644 --- a/mm/list_lru.c +++ b/mm/list_lru.c @@ -19,8 +19,7 @@ bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item) WARN_ON_ONCE(nlru->nr_items < 0); if (list_empty(item)) { list_add_tail(item, &nlru->list); - if (nlru->nr_items++ == 0) - node_set(nid, lru->active_nodes); + nlru->nr_items++; spin_unlock(&nlru->lock); return true; } @@ -37,8 +36,7 @@ bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item) spin_lock(&nlru->lock); if (!list_empty(item)) { list_del_init(item); - if (--nlru->nr_items == 0) - node_clear(nid, lru->active_nodes); + nlru->nr_items--; WARN_ON_ONCE(nlru->nr_items < 0); spin_unlock(&nlru->lock); return true; @@ -90,8 +88,7 @@ restart: case LRU_REMOVED_RETRY: assert_spin_locked(&nlru->lock); case LRU_REMOVED: - if (--nlru->nr_items == 0) - node_clear(nid, lru->active_nodes); + nlru->nr_items--; WARN_ON_ONCE(nlru->nr_items < 0); isolated++; /* @@ -133,7 +130,6 @@ int list_lru_init_key(struct list_lru *lru, struct lock_class_key *key) if (!lru->node) return -ENOMEM; - nodes_clear(lru->active_nodes); for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) { spin_lock_init(&lru->node[i].lock); if (key) -- 1.7.10.4