On 9/30/2025 5:16 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > knav_dma_open_channel now only returns NULL on failure instead of error > pointers. Replace IS_ERR_OR_NULL checks with simple NULL checks. > > Suggested-by: Simon Horman > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon > --- > Changes in V2: > * renewed version > * Dropped the fixes since code refactoring was involved. > Whats the justification for splitting this apart from patch 1 of 3? It seems like we ought to just do all this in a single patch. I don't see the value in splitting this apart into 3 patches, unless someone else on the list thinks it is valuable. > V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250926150853.2907028-1-nm@ti.com/ > > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/netcp_core.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/netcp_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/netcp_core.c > index 2f9d26c791e3..5ee13db568f0 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/netcp_core.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/netcp_core.c > @@ -1338,7 +1338,7 @@ int netcp_txpipe_open(struct netcp_tx_pipe *tx_pipe) > > tx_pipe->dma_channel = knav_dma_open_channel(dev, > tx_pipe->dma_chan_name, &config); > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tx_pipe->dma_channel)) { > + if (!tx_pipe->dma_channel) { > dev_err(dev, "failed opening tx chan(%s)\n", > tx_pipe->dma_chan_name); > ret = -EINVAL; > @@ -1359,7 +1359,7 @@ int netcp_txpipe_open(struct netcp_tx_pipe *tx_pipe) > return 0; > > err: > - if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tx_pipe->dma_channel)) > + if (tx_pipe->dma_channel) > knav_dma_close_channel(tx_pipe->dma_channel); > tx_pipe->dma_channel = NULL; > return ret; > @@ -1678,7 +1678,7 @@ static int netcp_setup_navigator_resources(struct net_device *ndev) > > netcp->rx_channel = knav_dma_open_channel(netcp->netcp_device->device, > netcp->dma_chan_name, &config); > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(netcp->rx_channel)) { > + if (!netcp->rx_channel) { > dev_err(netcp->ndev_dev, "failed opening rx chan(%s\n", > netcp->dma_chan_name); > ret = -EINVAL;