From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=ySTr=D3=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AE9C4363A
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 18:54:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF342222D
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 18:54:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S2437780AbgJTSy3 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:54:29 -0400
Received: from smtprelay0058.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.58]:58230 "EHLO
        smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2437740AbgJTSy3 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:54:29 -0400
Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60])
        by smtprelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6A21802150E;
        Tue, 20 Oct 2020 18:54:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D
X-HE-Tag: shoe55_10129fa27242
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2143
Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.133.149])
        (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com)
        by omf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA;
        Tue, 20 Oct 2020 18:54:26 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <0cdbe9c56d73402be9e3b36a662c68515abcfae9.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc:     Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        George Burgess <gbiv@google.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:54:25 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdmhqq0DT5csX6W8xDF=nuXgJJ_Rtc2xf++=Q9uA4tZEvw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20201017160928.12698-1-trix@redhat.com>
         <20201018054332.GB593954@kroah.com>
         <CAKwvOdkR_Ttfo7_JKUiZFVqr=Uh=4b05KCPCSuzwk=zaWtA2_Q@mail.gmail.com>
         <3bc5c2e3b3edc22a4d167ec807ecdaaf8dcda76d.camel@perches.com>
         <CAKwvOdmhqq0DT5csX6W8xDF=nuXgJJ_Rtc2xf++=Q9uA4tZEvw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2020-10-20 at 11:51 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 11:42 AM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-10-19 at 12:42 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > We probably should add all 3 to W=2 builds (wrapped in cc-option).
> > > I've filed https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1180 to
> > > follow up on.
> > 
> > I suggest using W=1 as people that are doing cleanups
> > generally use that and not W=123 or any other style.
> > 
> > Every other use of W= is still quite noisy and these
> > code warnings are relatively trivially to fix up.
> 
> The 0day bot folks have enabled W=1 recently; hence the uptick in
> reports of -Wimplicit-function-declaration.
> 
> If it gets added to W=1, it's effectively "on by default" for new code
> tested by 0day bot.

And that would mean these get fixed faster no?
Isn't that a good thing?